ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration to evaluate the status of N2 in preoperative non-small cell lung cancer: a diagnostic test.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of Nanoformulations in the Treatment of Lung Cancer.Recent patents on nanotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As a minimally invasive method, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) was more accurate than non-invasive methods such as positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) to evaluate the lymph nodes in preoperative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PET/CT has more anatomical advantages than PET scanning and is more accurate in lung cancer staging. However, no relevant studies have comparatively evaluated PET/CT and EBUS-TBNA for NSCLC patients. Methods: A total of 112 patients were included in this retrospective analysis. The golden diagnosis of N2 status was postoperative pathological results. In EBUS-TBNA puncture specimens, if clear malignant tumor cells could be seen, the results were taken as positive. In PET/CT image analysis, the CT values, short diameter, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of each lymph node were recorded to evaluate N2 status. The results of PET/CT and EBUS-TBNA were compared with the final pathological results, and respective sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated. - Then, the patients were divided into adenocarcinoma group and squamous cell carcinoma group -and the results were calculated and compared with the above method. Results: The results showed that EBUS-TBNA had a higher diagnostic value for mediastinal lymph nodes than PET/CT, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). In NSCLC patients, the results showed that the sensitivity (P=0.013), specificity (P<0.001), PPV (P<0.001), NPV (P<0.001), and accuracy (P<0.001) of EBUS-TBNA were higher than that of PET/CT (AUC =0.954 and 0.636, respectively). In adenocarcinoma cases, specificity (P<0.001), PPV (P<0.001), NPV (P<0.001), and accuracy (P<0.001) of EBUS-TBNA were higher than that of PET/CT (AUC =0.957 and 0.596, respectively).In cases with squamous cell carcinoma, specificity (P=0.003), PPV (P<0.001), and accuracy (P<0.001) of EBUS-TBNA were higher than PET/CT (AUC =0.952 and 0.657, respectively). Conclusions: For preoperative diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node metastases in NSCLC, EBUS-TBNA is more accurate than PET/CT. For those patients with suspected mediastinal lymph node metastasis, EBUS-TBNA should be preferred method to evaluate the status of mediastinal lymph nodes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.