Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35813716›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022

Serial evaluation of segmental esophageal reconstruction using a polyurethane scaffold in a pig model.

Tiffany L Sarrafian, Jennifer L Brazzell, Matthew Barron, Johnathon Aho, Ellen Blanco, Chelsea Powell, Jed Johnson, Dennis A Wigle

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tiffany L SarrafianDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jennifer L BrazzellIDEXX BioAnalytics, Columbia, MO, USA.
Matthew BarronDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Johnathon AhoDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ellen BlancoDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Chelsea PowellDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jed JohnsonNanofiber Solutions, Inc., Dublin, OH, USA.
Dennis A WigleDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USIDEXX Laboratories (United States) · USNanofiber Solutions (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many esophageal pathologies are clinically treated by resection and reconstruction of the esophagus. Surgical esophagectomy remains a morbid procedure and despite minimally invasive advances, has changed little in decades. Novel approaches to esophageal segmental resection and reconstruction are an unmet need. Methods: Circumferential thoracic esophageal transection was performed in both male and female pigs and the defects reconstructed using 5 or 10 cm polyurethane (PU) tubular grafts and stented. A subset were treated with stent only. Animals were survived to 14, 30, 60, and 399 days. Tissues were evaluated histologically, and via non-invasive serial endoscopy and contrast swallowing studies in long-term animals. Results: Luminal patency was achieved in all animals with no clinical evidence of leak. In short-term animals, there was healing noted in all cases with a variably sized region of ulceration remaining at the most central part of the repaired tube (between the proximal and distal anastomosis). In four long-term animals following stent removal, two resumed normal diet and thrived, while two animals were euthanized prior to the proposed endpoint because of stricture formation and inability to tolerate a normal diet. Re-epithelialization was observed in all groups, and more complete over time. Conclusions: The PU scaffold provides a matrix across which formation of new tissue can occur. The mechanisms through which this happens remain unclear, but likely a combination of fibrosis and tissue contraction, in conjunction with new tissue formation.

Indexed as

circumferential defectesophageal regenerationPorcinescaffold

Identifiers

PMID35813716
PMCPMC9264045
OpenAlexW4285034275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.