ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022
Clinical outcomes and quantitative CT analysis after bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using valves for advanced emphysema.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Quest for Safe and Effective Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction-A Matter of Correct Scaffolding?American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Endobronchial valves for emphysema and persistent air-leak: 10-year experience in an Asian country.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- A preclinical animal study to evaluate the operability and safety of domestic one-way endobronchial valves.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) using Zephyr endobronchial valve (EBV) and intrabronchial valve (IBV) has been shown to improve lung function and exercise capacity in severe emphysema. However, changes in airway structures and whether these are related to the clinical improvements remain unclear. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on patients treated with BLVR. We compared changes in 2nd-, 3rd-, and 4th-generation bronchial structures after therapy, including wall thickness (WT), percentage of wall thickness (WT%), intraluminal area (LA), wall area (WA), and WA%. Responder and non-responder subgroup analysis according to minimum clinically important difference (MCID) which was defined as an improvement of 15% in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV Results: Of the 19 patients, 11 were treated with EBV and 8 with IBV. In ipsilateral non-target lobes, WT% decreased significantly in 3rd-generation bronchi at 1 month, 3, and 6 months, as well as their WA% at 1 month and 6 months. Non-responders, who were unable to achieve MCID, showed no consistent bronchial wall changes. And their LA of 3rd-generation bronchi decreased especially at 1 month. After BLVR, the target lobe volume decreased significantly until 12 months of follow-up. The volume of ipsilateral lobes could increase correspondingly and achieve the best improvements at 6 months. The contralateral lung volume showed slight amelioration but there was no statistical significance. Conclusions: Both airway structures and lung volumes showed changes after BLVR. The 3rd- and 4th-bronchial walls tend to be thinner, which were consistent with clinical improvements. Further studies are needed to prove this conclusion and find detect potential mechanics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.