ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022
Surgical lung biopsy for interstitial lung diseases-a single center study of 129 patients.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Yield and safety of different biopsy types in interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Pooled it
- The Role of Surgical Lung Biopsy in Diagnosis and Treatment Guidance for Interstitial Lung Diseases: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Safety and Feasibility of Wedge Resection in Lung Cancer Patients with Pre-Existing Interstitial Lung Disease: Real-World Data from Multicenter, Shizuoka Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Two autopsied gastric cancer cases of rare drug-induced pneumonia associated with nivolumab plus S-1 and oxaliplatin: a case report.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Role of Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Interstitial Lung Disease Diagnosis: A Cytological Perspective.Journal of cytologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: According to guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), a diagnostic surgical lung biopsy should be used to obtain the differential diagnosis of an ILD in patients with ILDs, which are difficult to distinguish clinically. However, the risk of developing postoperative complications such as postoperative pulmonary fistula or acute exacerbation is a concern. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of surgical lung biopsy for the differential diagnosis of ILDs. Methods: From October 2007 to July 2019, 129 patients thought to have ILD underwent a surgical lung biopsy at Toho University Omori Medical Center. We conducted a retrospective study on the diagnosis and safety of surgical lung biopsy for patients with ILD. Results: The 30- and 60-day mortality was 0%. Postoperative complications occurred in 13 of 129 (10.1%) patients. The complications included pneumothorax in 8 (6.2%) patients after removal of the chest tube, postoperative pneumonia in 2 (1.0%), and acute exacerbation in 1 (0.8%). Postoperative pneumothorax was observed in 4 of 13 patients (30.7%) who underwent a biopsy of the apex of the lung (right S1, left S1+2), which was a significantly higher rate of postoperative pneumothorax than seen for patients undergoing biopsy at other sites (P=0.0086). Conclusions: Surgical lung biopsy for the differential diagnosis of an ILD was performed safely. However, biopsy sites for ILDs need to be carefully selected to avoid postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.