ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2022
Brain-Reactive Antibodies are Potential Biomarkers for Evaluating Therapeutic Efficacy in NPSLE Patients.
Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endothelial Dysfunction: Insights into Systemic Lupus Erythematosus-associated Cardiovascular Disease and Neuropsychiatric Manifestations.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Review
- A Case of Optic Neuritis with Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Antibody and Secondary Ophthalmoplegia.Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press) · 2026Article
- Role of combination immunotherapy in restoring brain synergistic functional connectivity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus without overt neuropsychiatric manifestations.Lupus science & medicine · 2025Article
- Diffuse neuropsychiatric lupus: Clinical evidence, immune-mediated mechanisms, and therapeutic insights.Seminars in immunology · 2025Review
- Examination of the shared genetic architecture between multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus facilitates discovery of novel lupus risk loci.Human genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) is the main cause of disability and death in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It can cause cognitive impairment and organic brain syndrome. Brain-reactive antibodies, such as anti-DNA/anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antibodies (DNRAbs), anti-microtubule-associated protein 2 (anti-MAP2) antibodies, and anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (anti-GFAP) antibodies are thought to participate in the progression of NPSLE and thus considered potential diagnostic biomarkers, but whether they can be used for evaluating therapeutic efficacy in NPSLE is unknown. Patients and methods: Overall, 17 NPSLE patients and 10 non-SLE controls were included in this study. All the patients were treated with glucocorticoid (GC) pulse therapy. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of DNRAbs and anti-MAP2 and anti-GFAP antibodies were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The differences between the CSF concentrations of these antibodies in NPSLE patients before and after GC pulse therapy were analyzed. Results: CSF concentrations of DNRAbs and anti-MAP2 and anti-GFAP antibodies were significantly higher in NPSLE patients compared to the non-SLE controls. Among the patients, CSF concentration of DNRAbs was significantly higher in the patients with acute confusional state (ACS) than in those with non-ACS diffuse NPSLE or focal NPSLE. Additionally, CSF concentration of DNRAbs was significantly correlated with QIgG (r=0.4884, Conclusion: These results indicate that CSF DNRAbs and anti-MAP2 and anti-GFAP antibodies are potential biomarkers for evaluating therapeutic efficacy in NPSLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.