Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35813568›Full record

ArticleCurrent psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)2022

Need for cognitive closure and trust towards government predicting pandemic behavior and mental health: comparing United States and China.

Cixin Wang, Ningyu Tang, Danlei Zhen, Xiaojing Romy Wang, Jingshu Zhang, Yeram Cheong, Qianyu Zhu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Risk, Obligation, and Public Noncompliance with Mobility Directives in China during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cixin WangDepartment of Counseling, Higher Education, & Special Education, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
Ningyu TangAntai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Danlei ZhenAntai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaojing Romy WangDepartment of Communication, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
Jingshu ZhangAntai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yeram CheongAsian American Studies Program, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
Qianyu ZhuDepartment of Counseling, Higher Education, & Special Education, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
University of Maryland, College Park · USShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNHainan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Residents of the United States and China have responded very differently to the implementation of COVID-19 preventive measures. This study introduces the uncertainty reduction theory and the need for cognitive closure (NFC) framework into the context of a public health crisis and compares models across the United States and China. Specifically, we collected survey data to examine how NFC, trust in government, and attitudes toward preventive measures predicted pandemic compliance behaviors, depressive symptoms, and life satisfaction among 745 college students (399 from China and 346 from the United States). Chinese participants trusted their government more, believed COVID preventive measures to be more beneficial, and reported more pandemic compliance and fewer depressive symptoms than U.S.

participantsTrust in government and attitudes towards preventive measures mediated the relationships between NFC and pandemic compliance behaviors among Chinese participants but not U.S.

participantsNFC predicted better mental health outcomes among participants in China compared to U.S.

participantsTrust in government mediated NFC and mental health outcomes among Chinese participants. Trust in government predicted better mental health (fewer depressive symptoms and more life satisfaction) in both the United States and China. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings for promoting mental health and pandemic compliance behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic are discussed.

Indexed as

COVID-19 behaviorCultureMental healthNeed for cognitive closureTrust in government

Identifiers

PMID35813568
PMCPMC9255507
OpenAlexW4283821936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.