ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2022
Open Reduction of Displaced Radial Neck Fractures in Children by Internal Fixation Techniques: Comparison of Percutaneous Kirschner Wiring and Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Subcapital Realignment of the Displaced Pediatric Radial Head-Technical Description and Early Clinical Results.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Flexible intramedullary nailing versus Kirschner wire fixation in the treatment of paediatric radial neck fractures: a minimum 2-year follow-up study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- The Presence of Associated Injuries in Pediatric Radial Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis of Pooled Individual Patient Data.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Comparison of midterm efficacy of Kirschner wires and elastic intramedullary nails after closed reduction of Judet type 3 radial neck fractures in children: a multicenter study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although most paediatric radial neck fractures can be treated with closed reduction, some severely displaced fractures require open reduction. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of ESIN and KW fixation in open reduction of radial neck fracture in children. Methods: Twenty-four patients with mean age of 8.5 years were included. Four of the patients had a Judet type III fracture and 20 had a Judet type IV fracture. Ten patients who underwent percutaneous KW fixation were assigned to group A, while 14 patients who underwent ESIN fixation were assigned to group B. Variables of interest included age, sex, fracture type, associated lesions, surgical time, fracture reduction, cost, follow-up, healing time, X-rays, clinical outcomes, and complications. Results: There were no significant between-group differences in sex, age, additional injuries, fracture type, and quality of reduction. Costs were significantly lower in Group A. Fracture healing was achieved in 23 of 24 patients (10/10 in group A and 13/14 in group B). In a postoperative elbow function assessment based on the Steele and Graham classification, 80% of patients in group A had a score of excellent or good, compared to 78.6% of patients in group B. Two cases of nail shifting and joint protrusion were observed in group B, one of which also presented with nonunion during follow-up. Conclusions: Both KW and ESIN may achieve good clinical outcomes, but KW is associated with lower costs, easier implant removal (without the need for a secondary surgery), and lower iatrogenic complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.