ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Treatment of Fracture of the Calcaneus via Bone Axial X-Ray Image-Based Minimally Invasive Approach.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Traditional Chinese bone-setting combined with percutaneous screw fixation for comminuted calcaneal fractures: A case report and review of literature.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To discuss the values of two bone axial X-ray image-based minimally invasive approach surgeries in the diagnosis and treatment of fracture of the calcaneus, 80 patients diagnosed with fracture of the calcaneus by bone axial X-ray examination were selected and divided equally into the minimally invasive longitudinal approach (MILA) group (40 cases) and the sinus tarsal approach (STA) group (40 cases). Besides, the duration of operation, the incidence of complications, the time-to-start weight training, and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) foot function scoring system between the patients in the two groups were compared. The results showed that the duration of operation and incidence of complications among the patients in the MILA group (42.87 ± 5.12 minutes, 20%) were both superior to those among the patients in the STA group (60.43 ± 7.31 minutes, 32.5%). The time-to-start weight training in the MILA group was 5.2 weeks, which was obviously shorter than that in the STA group (5.7 weeks). The difference in AOFAS scores between the two groups was not significant. The walking pavement score in the MILA group (4.2 ± 0.37 points) was slightly higher than that in the STA group (3.3 ± 0.45 points), and the differences demonstrated statistical meaning (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.