Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35813378›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Automated Oxygen Delivery in Neonatal Intensive Care.

Vrinda Nair, Prakash Loganathan, Mithilesh Kumar Lal, Thomas Bachman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Routine use of automated FiOFrontiers in pediatrics · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vrinda NairNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, South Tees Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Prakash LoganathanNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, South Tees Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Mithilesh Kumar LalNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, South Tees Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Thomas BachmanSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oxygen is the most common drug used in the neonatal intensive care. It has a narrow therapeutic range in preterm infants. Too high (hyperoxemia) or low oxygen (hypoxemia) is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. It is not only prudent to maintain oxygen saturations in the target range, but also to avoid extremes of oxygen saturations. In routine practice when done manually by the staff, it is challenging to maintain oxygen saturations within the target range. Automatic control of oxygen delivery is now feasible and has shown to improve the time spent with in the target range of oxygen saturations. In addition, it also helps to avoid extremes of oxygen saturation. However, there are no studies that evaluated the clinical outcomes with automatic control of oxygen delivery. In this narrative review article, we aim to present the current evidence on automatic oxygen control and the future directions.

Indexed as

automated oxygenhyperoxemiahypoxemiaoxygen saturationpreterm

Identifiers

PMID35813378
PMCPMC9257066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.