Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35813323›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2022

CIRMI-a new term for a concept worthy of further exploration: a narrative review.

Gladness Dakalo Nethathe, Jeffrey Lipman, Ronald Anderson, Charles Feldman

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Vasoactive agents in septic shock-individualized strategies].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Gladness Dakalo NethatheSchool of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jeffrey LipmanFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Ronald AndersonDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Charles FeldmanSchool of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUUniversity of Pretoria · ZAUniversity of Queensland · AUUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) describes hypothalamic-pituitary-axis impairment during critical illness associated with three major pathophysiological events; dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-axis, altered cortisol metabolism, and tissue corticosteroid resistance. Similar changes are evident with regard to mineralocorticoid dysfunction in critical illness. Hyperreninemic hypoaldosteronism describes a sub-population of critically ill patients with an impaired adrenal aldosterone response to increased levels of renin. In the light of the recent demonstration of significant mortality improvements associated with adjunctive glucocorticoid treatment in combination with fludrocortisone in septic shock, and the suggestion that angiotensin II is effective in treating vasodilatory shock, the clinical relevance of mineralocorticoid dysfunction in critical illness requires further exploration. This interpretative review considers hyperreninemic hypoaldosteronism, a concept worth re-examining in the light of the potential mortality benefit of mineralocorticoid supplementation in critical illness. We compare the pathophysiological and clinical characteristics of CIRCI and hyperreninemic hypoaldosteronism, two syndromes that represent corticosteroid and mineralocorticoid dysfunction in critical illness. We highlight gaps in the literature and give novel insights into the limitations of assessment, diagnosis and treatment. Methods: English language abstracts and articles published before June 2021 were identified through PubMed and Google Scholar. Randomized trials, observational studies, basic sciences studies, systematic and narrative reviews were considered. Reference lists of articles were searched for further relevant material. Key Content and Findings: Difficulties are encountered in interpreting measures of gluco- and mineralo-corticoid activity in critical illness. Aldosterone levels, like cortisol, have been shown to be increased in sepsis and hemorrhagic shock. The finding of hyperreninemia and hyperaldosteronism with an aldosterone/plasma renin activity ratio below 2 should prompt consideration of hyperreninemic hypoaldosteronism, a finding, which likely signifies the loss of negative feedback control of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Conclusions: As there is evidence to suggest that in acute critical illness, hyperreninemic hypoaldosteronism, is associated with poor outcomes, co-administration of hydrocortisone with fludrocortisone in patients with septic shock should be considered. In keeping with the concept of CIRCI, we suggest the term critical illness-related mineralocorticoid insufficiency as a more appropriate description of the impaired aldosterone response to increased levels of renin seen in this group of patients.

Indexed as

Adrenal insufficiencycorticosteroid insufficiencycritical illnessglucocorticoidsmineralocorticoids

Identifiers

PMID35813323
PMCPMC9263790
OpenAlexW4285022259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.