Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35813320›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

A 3D multi-modal intelligent intervention system using electromagnetic navigation for real-time positioning and ultrasound images: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Weiwei Tang, Yun Zhou, Hui Zhao, Guangshun Sun, Dawei Rong, Zhitao Li, Meng Hu, Liu Han, Xu He, Suming Zhao and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Weiwei Tang *Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Yun Zhou *Department of Intervention, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hui Zhao *Department of Intervention, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Guangshun SunDepartment of General Surgery, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Dawei RongHepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Zhitao LiDepartment of General Surgery, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Meng HuDepartment of Research, Beijing Medis Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Liu HanDepartment of Intervention, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xu HeDepartment of Intervention, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Suming ZhaoDepartment of Intervention, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Xiaoyang ChenDepartment of Intervention, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Zhongming LiDepartment of Intervention, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Hongxin YuanDepartment of Intervention, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Songwang ChenDepartment of Intervention, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Qian WangResearch Unit Analytical Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany.
Zhouxiao LiDepartment of Hand Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Jianping GuDepartment of Intervention, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xuehao WangHepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Jinhua SongHepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anesthesia, nerve block, therapeutic injections, and biopsies all require an acupuncture intervention. However, traditional two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound-guided needle puncture is often challenging and therefore requires the use of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound images to accurately identify and evaluate the patient's anatomical structure. Methods: In this study, a 3D multi-modal intelligent intervention system using electromagnetic navigation for real-time positioning and ultrasound images was described. A total of 190 cases requiring puncture were randomly divided into control (conventional 2D ultrasound instrument) and experimental (novel 3D ultrasound imedis9000) groups. The advantages and disadvantages of the two puncture methods were prospectively analyzed in the 190 cases, and the feasibility of electromagnetic navigation real-time positioning was compared to ultrasound imaging. Results: This study included 190 cases from two centers that required puncture treatment and were randomly assigned to the control (conventional 2D ultrasound instrument; n=95) or the experimental (novel 3D ultrasound imedis9000; n=95) groups. Percutaneous vascular puncture, percutaneous biopsy, percutaneous bile duct puncture, thoracic paravertebral nerve block, and sciatic nerve block operations were performed separately. The results indicated that the puncture time and number of trials in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group. No significant difference was identified in the basic vital signs between the two groups before and after surgery. The success rate of the novel 3D ultrasound imedis9000 was 100%, and the success rate of the conventional 2D ultrasound instrument was 95.7%. Furthermore, the results also showed that the novel 3D ultrasound imedis9000 and the matching coaxial positioning channel puncture needle had low pain, good toughness and strength, and great convenience. Conclusions: The new 3D multi-modal intelligent intervention system using electromagnetic navigation real-time positioning and ultrasound images has significant advantages compared with conventional 2D ultrasound in terms of puncture time, number of trials, operation difficulty, and convenience, and is worthy of further promotion and use in clinics. Trial Registration: Beijing Municipal Drug Administration, 20190015.

Indexed as

prospectivereal time positioningThree-dimensional ultrasound (3D ultrasound)ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35813320
PMCPMC9263796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.