Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35813280›Full record

Observational studyThe lancet. Healthy longevity2022

Antibody and cellular immune responses following dual COVID-19 vaccination within infection-naive residents of long-term care facilities: an observational cohort study.

Gokhan Tut, Tara Lancaster, Panagiota Sylla, Megan S Butler, Nayandeep Kaur, Eliska Spalkova, Christopher Bentley, Umayr Amin, Azar Jadir, Samuel Hulme and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The lancet. Healthy longevity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Update on COVID-19 and Effectiveness of a Vaccination Campaign in a Global Context.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gokhan TutInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Tara LancasterInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Panagiota SyllaInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Megan S ButlerInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Nayandeep KaurInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Eliska SpalkovaInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Christopher BentleyInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Umayr AminInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Azar JadirInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Samuel HulmeInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Morenike AyodeleInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
David BoneInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Elif TutInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Rachel BrutonInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Maria KrutikovInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Rebecca GiddingsInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Madhumita ShrotriInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Borscha AzmiInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Christopher FullerInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Verity BayntonHealth Security Agency UK, London, UK.
Aidan Irwin-SingerHealth Security Agency UK, London, UK.
Andrew HaywardHealth Data Research UK, London, UK.
Andrew CopasInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Laura ShallcrossInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Paul MossInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity College London · GBHealth Data Research UK · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R011230/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Older age and frailty are risk factors for poor clinical outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection. As such, COVID-19 vaccination has been prioritised for individuals with these factors, but there is concern that immune responses might be impaired due to age-related immune dysregulation and comorbidity. We aimed to study humoral and cellular responses to COVID-19 vaccines in residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Methods: In this observational cohort study, we assessed antibody and cellular immune responses following COVID-19 vaccination in members of staff and residents at 74 LTCFs across the UK. Staff and residents were eligible for inclusion if it was possible to link them to a pseudo-identifier in the COVID-19 datastore, if they had received two vaccine doses, and if they had given a blood sample 6 days after vaccination at the earliest. There were no comorbidity exclusion criteria. Participants were stratified by age (<65 years or ≥65 years) and infection status (previous SARS-CoV-2 infection [infection-primed group] or SARS-CoV-2 naive [infection-naive group]). Anticoagulated edetic acid (EDTA) blood samples were assessed and humoral and cellular responses were quantified. Findings: Between Dec 11, 2020, and June 27, 2021, blood samples were taken from 220 people younger than 65 years (median age 51 years [IQR 39-61]; 103 [47%] had previously had a SARS-CoV-2 infection) and 268 people aged 65 years or older of LTCFs (median age 87 years [80-92]; 144 [43%] had a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection). Samples were taken a median of 82 days (IQR 72-100) after the second vaccination. Antibody responses following dual vaccination were strong and equivalent between participants younger then 65 years and those aged 65 years and older in the infection-primed group (median 125 285 Au/mL [1128 BAU/mL] for <65 year olds Interpretation: These data reveal suboptimal post-vaccine immune responses within infection-naive residents of LTCFs, and they suggest the need for optimisation of immune protection through the use of booster vaccination. Funding: UK Government Department of Health and Social Care.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAged, 80 and overAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunity, CellularLong-Term CareMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID35813280
PMCPMC9252532
OpenAlexW4283812271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.