Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35813279›Full record

ArticleThe lancet. Healthy longevity2022

Duration of vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalisation, and death in residents and staff of long-term care facilities in England (VIVALDI): a prospective cohort study.

Madhumita Shrotri, Maria Krutikov, Hadjer Nacer-Laidi, Borscha Azmi, Tom Palmer, Rebecca Giddings, Christopher Fuller, Aidan Irwin-Singer, Verity Baynton, Gokhan Tut and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The lancet. Healthy longevity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines and Multiple Sclerosis: An Update.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Evaluating the Usefulness of Population-Wide COVID-19 Testing in the Omicron Era: Insights from a German Model.Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. COVID-19 outbreak trends in Canada, 2021.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Madhumita ShrotriUCL Institute of Health Informatics, London, UK.
Maria KrutikovUCL Institute of Health Informatics, London, UK.
Hadjer Nacer-LaidiUCL Institute of Health Informatics, London, UK.
Borscha AzmiUCL Institute of Health Informatics, London, UK.
Tom PalmerUCL Institute for Global Health, London, UK.
Rebecca GiddingsUCL Institute of Health Informatics, London, UK.
Christopher FullerUCL Institute of Health Informatics, London, UK.
Aidan Irwin-SingerDepartment of Health and Social Care, London, UK.
Verity BayntonDepartment of Health and Social Care, London, UK.
Gokhan TutInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Paul MossInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Andrew HaywardUCL Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, London, UK.
Andrew CopasUCL Institute for Global Health, London, UK.
Laura ShallcrossUCL Institute of Health Informatics, London, UK.
University College London · GBDepartment of Health and Social Care · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBHealth Data Research UK · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationChief Scientist OfficeDepartment of HealthMedical Research CouncilWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 222907/Z/21/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Residents and staff in long-term care facilities have been prioritised for vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, but data on potential waning of vaccine effectiveness and the effect of booster doses in this vulnerable population are scarce. We aimed to evaluate effectiveness of one, two, and three vaccine doses against infection and severe clinical outcomes in staff and residents of long-term care facilities in England over the first year following vaccine roll-out. Methods: The VIVALDI study is a prospective cohort study done in 331 long-term care facilities in England. Residents aged 65 years or older and staff aged 18 years or older were eligible for participation. Participants had routine PCR testing throughout the study period between Dec 8, 2020, and Dec 11, 2021. We retrieved all PCR results and cycle threshold values for PCR-positive samples from routine testing in long-term care facilities, and positive PCR results from clinical testing in hospitals through the UK's COVID-19 Datastore. PCR results were linked to participants using pseudo-identifiers based on individuals' unique UK National Health Service (NHS) numbers, which were also used to retrieve vaccination records from the National Immunisation Management Service, hospitalisation records from NHS England, and deaths data from the Office for National Statistics through the COVID-19 Datastore. In a Cox proportional hazards regression, we estimated vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19-related hospitalisation, and COVID-19-related death after one, two, and three vaccine doses, separately by previous SARS-CoV-2 exposure. This study is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN 14447421. Findings: 80 186 residents and staff of long-term care facilities had records available for the study period, of whom 15 518 eligible residents and 19 515 eligible staff were included in the analysis. For residents without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 exposure, vaccine effectiveness decreased from 61·7% (95% CI 35·1 to 77·4) to 22·0% (-14·9 to 47·0) against infection; from 89·0% (70·6 to 95·9) to 56·3% (30·1 to 72·6) against hospitalisation; and from 96·4% (84·3 to 99·2) to 64·4% (36·1 to 80·1) against death, when comparing 14-83 days after dose two and 84 days or more after dose two. For staff without evidence of previous exposure, vaccine effectiveness against infection decreased slightly from 57·9% (43·1 to 68·9) at 14-83 days after dose two to 42·1% (29·9 to 52·2) at 84 days or more after dose two. There were no hospitalisations or deaths among unexposed staff at 14-83 days, but seven hospitalisations (vaccine effectiveness 91·0% [95% CI 74·3 to 96·8]) and one death were observed at 84 days or more after dose two. High vaccine effectiveness was restored following a third vaccine dose, with vaccine effectiveness in unexposed residents of 72·7% (55·8 to 83·1) against infection, 90·1% (80·6 to 95·0) against hospitalisation, and 97·5% (88·1 to 99·5) against death; and vaccine effectiveness in unexposed staff of 78·2% (70·0 to 84·1) against infection and 95·8% (49·9 to 99·6) against hospitalisation. There were no COVID-19-related deaths among unexposed staff after the third vaccine dose. Interpretation: Our findings showed substantial waning of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against all outcomes in residents of long-term care facilities from 12 weeks after a primary course of ChAdOx1-S or mRNA vaccines. Boosters restored protection, and maximised immunity across all outcomes. These findings show the importance of boosting and the need for ongoing surveillance in this vulnerable cohort. Funding: UK Government Department of Health and Social Care.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansLong-Term CareProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2State MedicineVaccine EfficacyCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35813279
PMCPMC9252508
OpenAlexW4283817692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.