ReviewFrontiers in systems neuroscience2022
Functional Connectivity of the Chemosenses: A Review.
Review in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Olfactory and Cognitive Performance Improvement After Oxygen-Ozone Major Autohemotherapy in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Neurology international · 2026Article
- Odor-induced sweetness enhancement: EEG evidence for olfactory and gustatory cross-modal interactions.Current research in food science · 2026Article
- Prediction of alcohol intake patterns with olfactory and gustatory brain connectivity networks.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025Article
- Odor Pleasantness Modulates Functional Connectivity in the Olfactory Hedonic Processing Network.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Future Directions for Chemosensory Connectomes: Best Practices and Specific Challenges.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Article
- Interconnected sub-networks of the macaque monkey gustatory connectome.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional connectivity approaches have long been used in cognitive neuroscience to establish pathways of communication between and among brain regions. However, the use of these analyses to better understand how the brain processes chemosensory information remains nascent. In this review, we conduct a literature search of all functional connectivity papers of olfaction, gustation, and chemesthesis, with 103 articles discovered in total. These publications largely use approaches of seed-based functional connectivity and psychophysiological interactions, as well as effective connectivity approaches such as Granger Causality, Dynamic Causal Modeling, and Structural Equation Modeling. Regardless of modality, studies largely focus on elucidating neural correlates of stimulus qualities such as identity, pleasantness, and intensity, with task-based paradigms most frequently implemented. We call for further "model free" or data-driven approaches in predictive modeling to craft brain-behavior relationships that are free from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.