Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35813258›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2022

The Mount Sinai Prebiopsy Risk Calculator for Predicting any Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Development of a Risk Predictive Tool and Validation with Advanced Neural Networking, Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database, and European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator.

Sneha Parekh, Parita Ratnani, Ugo Falagario, Dara Lundon, Deepshikha Kewlani, Jordan Nasri, Zach Dovey, Dimitrios Stroumbakis, Daniel Ranti, Ralph Grauer and 26 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Sneha ParekhDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Parita RatnaniDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Ugo FalagarioDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Dara LundonDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Deepshikha KewlaniDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Jordan NasriDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Zach DoveyDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Dimitrios StroumbakisDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Daniel RantiDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Ralph GrauerDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Stanislaw SobotkaDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Adriana PedrazaDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Vinayak WagaskarDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Lajja MistryDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Ivan JamborDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Anna LantzDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Otto EttalaDepartment of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University hospital, Turku, Finland.
Armando StabileDepartment of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Pekka TaimenInstitute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Hannu J AronenDepartment of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Juha KnaapilaDepartment of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University hospital, Turku, Finland.
Ileana Montoya PerezDepartment of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Giorgio GandagliaDepartment of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Alberto MartiniDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Wolfgang PickerDepartment of Radiology, Aleris Cancer Center, Oslo, Norway.
Erik HaugSection of Urology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
Luigi CormioDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Tobias NordströmDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Alberto BrigantiDepartment of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Peter J BoströmDepartment of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University hospital, Turku, Finland.
Giuseppe CarrieriDepartment of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Kenneth HainesDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Michael A GorinUrology Associates and UPMC Western Maryland, Cumberland, MD, USA.
Peter WiklundDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Mani MenonDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Ash TewariDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USTurku University Hospital · FIIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITUniversity of Turku · FIKarolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SESykehuset i Vestfold · NOUniversity of Foggia · ITWestern Maryland Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The European Association of Urology guidelines recommend the use of imaging, biomarkers, and risk calculators in men at risk of prostate cancer. Risk predictive calculators that combine multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging with prebiopsy variables aid as an individualized decision-making tool for patients at risk of prostate cancer, and advanced neural networking increases reliability of these tools. Objective: To develop a comprehensive risk predictive online web-based tool using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical data, to predict the risk of any prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) applicable to biopsy-naïve men, men with a prior negative biopsy, men with prior positive low-grade cancer, and men with negative MRI. Design setting and participants: Institutional review board-approved prospective data of 1902 men undergoing biopsy from October 2013 to September 2021 at Mount Sinai were collected. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate clinical variables such as age, race, digital rectal examination, family history, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsy status, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score, and prostate volume, which emerged as predictors for any PCa and csPCa. Binary logistic regression was performed to study the probability. Validation was performed with advanced neural networking (ANN), multi-institutional European cohort (Prostate MRI Outcome Database [PROMOD]), and European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator (ERSPC RC) 3/4. Results and limitations: Overall, 2363 biopsies had complete clinical information, with 57.98% any cancer and 31.40% csPCa. The prediction model was significantly associated with both any PCa and csPCa having an area under the curve (AUC) of 81.9% including clinical data. The AUC for external validation was calculated in PROMOD, ERSPC RC, and ANN for any PCa (0.82 vs 0.70 vs 0.90) and csPCa (0.82 vs 0.78 vs 0.92), respectively. This study is limited by its retrospective design and overestimation of csPCa in the PROMOD cohort. Conclusions: The Mount Sinai Prebiopsy Risk Calculator combines PSA, imaging and clinical data to predict the risk of any PCa and csPCa for all patient settings. With accurate validation results in a large European cohort, ERSPC RC, and ANN, it exhibits its efficiency and applicability in a more generalized population. This calculator is available online in the form of a free web-based tool that can aid clinicians in better patients counseling and treatment decision-making. Patient summary: We developed the Mount Sinai Prebiopsy Risk Calculator (MSP-RC) to assess the likelihood of any prostate cancer and clinically significant disease based on a combination of clinical and imaging characteristics. MSP-RC is applicable to all patient settings and accessible online.

Indexed as

BiopsyClinically significantLow gradeMagnetic resonance imagingProstate cancerRisk calculator

Identifiers

PMID35813258
PMCPMC9257660
OpenAlexW4281262490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.