ArticleJSES international2022
Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for partial tears of the long head of the biceps tendon in patients with rotator cuff tears.
Article in JSES international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in Shoulder Pain Imaging: A Narrative Review of Current Practice and Emerging Trends.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- Microwave Digital Twin Prototype for Shoulder Injury Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- MRI findings and clinical testing for preoperative diagnosis of long head of the biceps pathology.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Current Understanding and New Advances in the Surgical Management of Reparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful for diagnosing shoulder diseases preoperatively. However, detection of partial tears of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) using current clinical tests and imaging modalities is difficult. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of radial-slice MRI for diagnosing partial tears of the LHBT. We hypothesized that radial-slice MRI may be a valuable diagnostic tool for assessing diagnosing tears of the LHBT. Methods: We retrospectively investigated 118 patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy for rotator cuff tears. Intraoperative LHBT findings were compared with the identification of partial tears of the LHBT on conventional-slice MRI and radial-slice MRI, using a 3.0-T system. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values for the detection of LHBT tears. Inter- and intraobserver reliability for radial-slice MRI was calculated using kappa statistics. Results: We diagnosed 69 patients (58%) without any LHBT tears and 49 with partial tears (42%), arthroscopically. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of conventional-slice MRI for detection of partial tears of the LHBT were 52%, 94%, 78%, 92%, and 58%, respectively. Radial-slice MRI had 84% sensitivity, 90% specificity, 86% accuracy, and 92% positive and 80% negative predictive values for partial tears of the LHBT. Inter- and intraobserver reliability for radial-slice MRI was 0.69 and 0.74, respectively, corresponding to high reproducibility and defined as good. Conclusion: Radial-slice MRI demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity than conventional-slice MRI. These results indicate that radial-slice MRI is useful for diagnosing LHBT partial tears.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.