Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35813138›Full record

ArticleJSES international2022

Glenoid retroversion does not impact clinical outcomes or implant survivorship after total shoulder arthroplasty with minimal, noncorrective reaming.

Travis J Dekker, W Jeffrey Grantham, Lucca Lacheta, Brandon T Goldenberg, Rony-Orijit Dey Hazra, Dylan R Rakowski, Grant J Dornan, Marilee P Horan, Peter J Millett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The role of glenoid version in arthroplasty.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Travis J DekkerThe Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA.
W Jeffrey GranthamThe Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA.
Lucca LachetaCenter for Outcomes-Based Orthopaedic Research, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.
Brandon T GoldenbergCenter for Outcomes-Based Orthopaedic Research, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.
Rony-Orijit Dey HazraThe Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA.
Dylan R RakowskiCenter for Outcomes-Based Orthopaedic Research, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.
Grant J DornanCenter for Outcomes-Based Orthopaedic Research, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.
Marilee P HoranCenter for Outcomes-Based Orthopaedic Research, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.
Peter J MillettThe Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypothesis: Both clinical outcomes and early rates of failure will not be associated with glenoid retroversion. Methods: All patients who underwent an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with minimal, noncorrective reaming between 2006 and 2016 with minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed. Measurements for retroversion, inclination, and posterior subluxation were obtained from magnetic resonance imaging or computerized tomography. A regression analysis was performed to assess the association between retroversion, inclination and subluxation, and their effect on patient reported outcomes (PROs). Clinical failures and complications were reported. Results: One hundred fifty-one anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (90% follow-up) with a mean follow-up of 4.6 years (range, 2-12 years) were assessed. The mean preoperative retroversion was 15.6° (range, 0.2-42.1), the mean posterior subluxation was 15.1% (range, -3.6 to 44.1%), and the mean glenoid inclination was 13.9° (range, -11.3 to 44.3). All median outcome scores improved significantly from pre- to post-operatively ( Conclusion: Anatomic total shoulder replacement with minimal and noncorrective glenoid reaming demonstrates reliable increases in patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes at a mean of 4.6-year follow-up in patients with up to 40° of native retroversion. Higher values of retroversion were not associated with early deterioration of clinical outcomes, revisions, or failures. Long-term studies are needed to see if survivorship and outcomes hold up over time.

Indexed as

Glenoid retroversionImplant survivorshipPatient-reported outcomesTotal shoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID35813138
PMCPMC9264025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.