Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35813136›Full record

ArticleJSES international2022

Mirels' score for upper limb metastatic lesions: do we need a different cutoff for recommending prophylactic fixation?

Katie A Hoban, Samantha Downie, Douglas J A Adamson, James G MacLean, Paul Cool, Arpit C Jariwala

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Response rate specific to bone metastasis of various cancers for immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Fibrous dysplasia: clinical and pathologic characteristics, surgical approaches, and outcomes in a large Italian cohort.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Predictive Factors for Failed Nonsurgical Management of Long Bone Metastasis and Myeloma.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Katie A HobanNHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Samantha DownieNHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Douglas J A AdamsonNHS Tayside, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, United Kingdom.
James G MacLeanNHS Tayside, Perth Royal Infirmary, Perth, United Kingdom.
Paul CoolThe Robert Jones and Agnus Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Gobowen, Oswestry, United Kingdom.
Arpit C JariwalaUniversity Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
NHS Tayside · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBPerth Royal Infirmary · GBRobert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to investigate the reproducibility, reliability, and accuracy of Mirels' score in upper limb bony metastatic disease and validate its use in predicting pathologic fractures. Methods: Forty-five patients with upper limb bony metastases met the inclusion criteria (62% male 28/45). The mean age was 69 years (SD 9.5), and the most common primaries were lung (29%, 13/45), followed by prostate and hematological (each 20%, 9/45). The most commonly affected bone was the humerus (76%, 35/45), followed by the ulna (6.5%, 3/45). Mirels' score was calculated in 32 patients; with plain radiographs at index presentation scored using Mirels' system by 6 raters. The radiological aspects (lesion size and appearance) were scored twice by each rater (2 weeks apart). Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were calculated using Fleiss' kappa test. Bland-Altman plots compared the variances of both individual components and the total Mirels' score. Results: The overall fracture rate of upper limb metastatic lesions was 76% (35/46) with a mean follow-up of 3.6 years (range 11 months-6.8 years). Where time from diagnosis to fracture was known (n = 20), fractures occurred at a median 19 days (interquartile range 60-10), and 80% (16/20) occurred within 3 months of diagnosis.Mirels' score of ≥9 did not accurately predict lesions that fractured (fracture rate 11%, 5/46, for Mirels' ≥ 9 vs. 65%, 30/46, for Mirels' ≤ 8, Conclusions: This study demonstrates moderate to substantial agreement between and within raters using Mirels' score on upper limb radiographs. However, Mirels' score had a poor sensitivity and specificity in predicting upper extremity fractures. Until a more valid scoring system has been developed, based on our study, we recommend a Mirels' threshold of ≥7/12 for considering prophylactic fixation of impending upper limb pathologic fractures. This contrasts with the current ≥9/12 cutoff, which is recommended for lower limb pathologic fractures.

Indexed as

MetastasisMirels’s scorePathological fractureReproducibilityUpper limbValidity

Identifiers

PMID35813136
PMCPMC9264023
OpenAlexW4224868017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.