Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35812994›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Doula care across the maternity care continuum and impact on maternal health: Evaluation of doula programs across three states using propensity score matching.

April M Falconi, Samantha G Bromfield, Trúc Tang, Demetria Malloy, Denae Blanco, Rn Susan Disciglio, Rn Winnie Chi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Stress-induced developmental plasticity and spontaneous preterm birth: A justice-oriented eco-evo-devo review.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

April M FalconiAnthem, Inc., Alexandria, VA, USA.
Samantha G BromfieldAnthem, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.
Trúc TangAnthem Blue Cross Medi_Cal, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Demetria MalloyAnthem Blue Cross Medi_Cal, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Denae BlancoAnthem, Inc, Florida Medicaid, Tampa Bay, FL, USA.
Rn Susan DisciglioEmpire BlueCross BlueShield HealthPlus, New York, NY, USA.
Rn Winnie ChiAnthem, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This evaluation of doula care emerges at a time when maternal mortality in the U.S. outranks every country in the developed world. Study objectives were to: 1) examine when over the maternity care continuum and with whom (i.e., clinical providers) doula care provides the greatest benefits to clinical health outcomes and health care utilization; and 2) evaluate whether women gain differential benefits from doulas depending upon race/ethnicity and health status. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Medicaid medical claims from California, Florida, and a northeastern state (USA) to compare maternal health outcomes between women who did and did not receive doula care between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2020. We used propensity score matching and logistic regression models to calculate associations between selected health outcomes and doula care. Our analysis included 298 pairs of women matched on age, race/ethnicity, state, socioeconomic status, and hospital type (teaching or non-teaching). Findings: Women who received doula care had 52.9% lower odds of cesarean delivery (OR: 0.471 95% CI: 0.29-0.79) and 57.5% lower odds of postpartum depression/postpartum anxiety (PPD/PPA) (OR: 0.425 95% CI: 0.22-0.82). Doulas who provided care with a clinical team that included a midwife most consistently showed a reduction in odds of cesarean delivery, regardless of the trimester when doula care was received. Women who received doula care during labor and birth, but not necessarily during pregnancy, showed a 64.7% reduction in odds of PPA/PPD (OR: 0.353 95% CI: 0.16-0.78) of PPA/PPD. Interpretation: The use of doulas appears an effective strategy for improving maternal health, especially among socioeconomically vulnerable and marginalized minority populations. Future studies could address research gaps through focusing on the relationship between doula care received in the postpartum period and postpartum health. Funding: No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this manuscript. Research was completed as part of the usual employment obligations to Anthem, Inc.

Indexed as

DoulasMaternal healthMaternal morbidityMedicaid

Identifiers

PMID35812994
PMCPMC9257331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.