Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35812975›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Microneedle Array-Assisted, Direct Delivery of Genome-Editing Proteins Into Plant Tissue.

Anchu Viswan, Ayana Yamagishi, Masamichi Hoshi, Yuichi Furuhata, Yoshio Kato, Natsumi Makimoto, Toshihiro Takeshita, Takeshi Kobayashi, Futoshi Iwata, Mitsuhiro Kimura and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. CRISPR/Cas9-Based Gene Editing in Soybean.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Recent advances of microneedles biosensors for plants.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anchu ViswanDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
Ayana YamagishiDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
Masamichi HoshiDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichi FuruhataBiomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan.
Yoshio KatoBiomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan.
Natsumi MakimotoSensing System Research Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan.
Toshihiro TakeshitaSensing System Research Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan.
Takeshi KobayashiSensing System Research Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan.
Futoshi IwataGraduate School of Medical Photonics, Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Mitsuhiro KimuraFaculty of Agriculture, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare, Takasaki, Japan.
Takeshi YoshizumiFaculty of Agriculture, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare, Takasaki, Japan.
Chikashi NakamuraDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JPTakasaki University of Health and Welfare · JPTokyo University of Agriculture and Technology · JPShizuoka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing in plants employing recombinant DNA often results in the incorporation of foreign DNA into the host genome. The direct delivery of genome-editing proteins into plant tissues is desired to prevent undesirable genetic alterations. However, in most currently available methods, the point of entry of the genome-editing proteins cannot be controlled and time-consuming processes are required to select the successfully transferred samples. To overcome these limitations, we considered a novel microneedle array (MNA)-based delivery system, in which the needles are horizontally aligned from the substrate surface, giving it a comb-like configuration. We aimed to deliver genome-editing proteins directly into the inner layers of leaf tissues; palisade, the spongy and subepidermal L2 layers of the shoot apical meristem (SAM) which include cells that can differentiate into germlines. The array with needles 2 μm wide and 60 μm long was effective in inserting into

Indexed as

Arabidopsis leafCas9Cre recombinasedirect deliverygenome editingmicroneedle array (MNA)soybean SAM

Identifiers

PMID35812975
PMCPMC9263851
OpenAlexW4283372226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.