Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35812897›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Establishment of an Efficient Genome Editing System in Lettuce Without Sacrificing Specificity.

Wenbo Pan, Xue Liu, Dayong Li, Huawei Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout ofFrontiers in genome editing · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Genome-Wide Identification of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An Improved Method forPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Promising Nanovectors for Gene Delivery in Plant Genome Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wenbo PanPeking University Institute of Advanced Agricultural Science, Weifang, China.
Xue LiuNational Engineering Research Center for Vegetables, Beijing Vegetable Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Science, Beijing, China.
Dayong LiNational Engineering Research Center for Vegetables, Beijing Vegetable Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Science, Beijing, China.
Huawei ZhangPeking University Institute of Advanced Agricultural Science, Weifang, China.
Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficiency of the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system remains limited in many crops. Utilizing strong promoters to boost the expression level of

Indexed as

CRISPR/Cas9genome editingGRF5intron-mediated enhancementlettuce

Identifiers

PMID35812897
PMCPMC9257259
OpenAlexW4283369392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.