Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35812896›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022

Establishment and Validation for Predicting the Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

Xuan Li, Haiyan Zhou, Xianhui Zhao, Huan Peng, Shanshan Luo, Juan Feng, Jianfu Heng, Heli Liu, Jie Ge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xuan LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, China.
Haiyan ZhouDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, China.
Xianhui ZhaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, China.
Huan PengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, China.
Shanshan LuoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, China.
Juan FengDepartment of Clinical Pharmaceutical Research Institution, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xiangya Medical School of Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, China.
Jianfu HengDepartment of Clinical Pharmaceutical Research Institution, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xiangya Medical School of Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, China.
Heli LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, China.
Jie GeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8618-5848

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is considered to be one of the important factors in determining the optimal treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram to predict LNM in patients with EGC. A total of 842 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were divided into training and testing sets with a ratio of 6 : 4 for model development. Clinical data (494 patients) from the hospital were used for external validation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the predictors using the training set. Logistic regression, LASSO regression, ridge regression, and elastic-net regression methods were used to construct the model. The performance of the model was quantified by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results showed that T stage, tumor size, and tumor grade were independent predictors of LNM in EGC patients. The AUC of the logistic regression model was 0.766 (95% CI, 0.709-0.823), which was slightly higher than that of the other models. However, the AUC of the logistic regression model in external validation was 0.625 (95% CI, 0.537-0.678). A nomogram was drawn to predict LNM in EGC patients based on the logistic regression model. Further validation based on gender, age, and grade indicated that the logistic regression predictive model had good adaptability to the population with grade III tumors, with an AUC of 0.803 (95% CI, 0.606-0.999). Our nomogram showed a good predictive ability and may provide a tool for clinicians to predict LNM in EGC patients.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaStomach NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHumansLymphatic MetastasisNomograms

Identifiers

PMID35812896
PMCPMC9259240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.