Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35812893›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

A Novel, Cleaved Probe-Based Reverse Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method for Specific and Sensitive Detection of Porcine Deltacoronavirus.

Haiyan Shen, Songqi Wang, Jun Huang, Qijie Lin, Chunhong Zhang, Zhicheng Liu, Jianfeng Zhang, Ming Liao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Haiyan ShenMaoming Branch Center of Guangdong Laboratory for LingNan Modern Agricultural Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Livestock Disease Prevention of Guangdong Province, Scientific Observation and Experiment Station of Veterinary Drugs and Diagnostic Techniques of Guangdong Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Songqi WangNational and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory for Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses, Ministry of Agriculture; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province; Key Laboratory of Animal Vaccine Development, Ministry of Agriculture; College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Jun HuangCollege of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Qijie LinNational and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory for Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses, Ministry of Agriculture; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province; Key Laboratory of Animal Vaccine Development, Ministry of Agriculture; College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Chunhong ZhangMaoming Branch Center of Guangdong Laboratory for LingNan Modern Agricultural Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Livestock Disease Prevention of Guangdong Province, Scientific Observation and Experiment Station of Veterinary Drugs and Diagnostic Techniques of Guangdong Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Zhicheng LiuMaoming Branch Center of Guangdong Laboratory for LingNan Modern Agricultural Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Livestock Disease Prevention of Guangdong Province, Scientific Observation and Experiment Station of Veterinary Drugs and Diagnostic Techniques of Guangdong Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Jianfeng ZhangMaoming Branch Center of Guangdong Laboratory for LingNan Modern Agricultural Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Livestock Disease Prevention of Guangdong Province, Scientific Observation and Experiment Station of Veterinary Drugs and Diagnostic Techniques of Guangdong Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Ming LiaoMaoming Branch Center of Guangdong Laboratory for LingNan Modern Agricultural Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Livestock Disease Prevention of Guangdong Province, Scientific Observation and Experiment Station of Veterinary Drugs and Diagnostic Techniques of Guangdong Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Key Laboratory of Guangdong Province · CNSouth China Agricultural University · CNFoshan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) causes watery diarrhea, vomiting, and 30-40% mortality in newborn piglets. A simple, rapid, and sensitive method for PDCoV detection is valuable in its surveillance and control. Here, we developed a novel, cleaved probe-based reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (CP-RT-LAMP) method for PDCoV detection. A cleaved probe with a ribonucleotide insertion that targeted the N gene of PDCoV was designed. During the reaction, the enzyme ribonuclease H2 is activated only when the cleaved probe is perfectly complementary to the template, leading to the hydrolytic release of a quencher moiety and signal output. This method can be easily used on a real-time fluorescence quantitative equipment or an on-site isothermal instrument combined with a smartphone. The specificity assay showed no cross-reactivity with other porcine enteric pathogens. This method had a detection limit of 25 copies/μL, suggesting comparable sensitivity with reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). In detecting 100 clinical samples (48 fecal swab specimens and 52 intestinal specimens), the detection rate of the CP-RT-LAMP method (26%) was higher than that of RT-qPCR (17%). Thus, it is a highly specific and sensitive diagnostic method for PDCoV, with a great application potential for monitoring PDCoV in the laboratory or point-of-care testing in the field.

Indexed as

CP-RT-LAMPpoint-of care testingporcine deltacoronavirusribonuclease H2specific and sensitive detection

Identifiers

PMID35812893
PMCPMC9261778
OpenAlexW4283332530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.