ArticleJournal of transport & health2022
A long-term perspective on the COVID-19: The bike sharing system resilience under the epidemic environment.
Article in Journal of transport & health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolvement patterns of usage in a medium-sized bike-sharing system during the COVID-19 pandemic.Sustainable cities and society · 2023Article
- Investigation on changes in the usage patterns of Seoul Bike usage patterns owing to COVID-19 according to pass type.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Examining the causal relationship between bike-share and public transit in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.Cities (London, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The sudden COVID-19 pandemic poses a fresh and tough challenge to bike sharing systems (BSS). With this epidemic as a shock event, this paper aspires to shed light on the phenomenon of changing demand and usage regularity in New York City's BSS under the epidemic environment, spanning a period of 18 months. Methods: Technically, BSS's normal performance and the timely responses to the outbreak could be conceptualized as having four different stages. One provides a comparative analysis of bike sharing spatial-temporal mobility patterns and connectivity of the bike sharing usage network, before and during the public health crisis with a macroscopic perspective. Also, a multivariate investigation of user and trip characteristics on BSS is conducted to uncover the difference in the frequency of outdoor and sojourn time between various user communities. Results: Due to the impact of the outbreak, BSS registered severe ridership drops, yet it quickly recovered to the pre-pandemic levels within months. The decline of bike sharing usage was felt throughout all the areas during the outbreak. However, there were places where BSS ridership actually increased, particularly in the areas near supermarkets, parks and hospitals. The less densely connected network of the bike sharing usage has also resulted in a reduction in users' destination heterogeneity. This study also finds evidence of the significant gender, age and cycling pattern gaps in response to potential risk. Conclusions: Investigating the dynamics of bike sharing usage will help to comprehend how the serious pandemic caused by COVID-19 impacts people's daily mobility. Practically, this work hopes to provide insights into adapting this unprecedented pandemic so as to respond to similar events in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.