ArticleChina CDC weekly2022
Article in China CDC weekly, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Two different genotypes ofMicrobial genomics · 2026Article
- Comparative pan-genomic analysis reveals pathogenic mechanisms and genomic plasticity inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Characterization ofSAGE open medicine · 2025Article
- Epidemiological characteristics, virulence genes, and antimicrobial resistance analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Prevalence and virulence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from clinical and environmental samples in Huzhou, China.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Distribution, Prevalence, and Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles of Infectious NoncholeraJournal of tropical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: 73 clinical isolates were collected through sentinel hospitals' surveillance in 2021. Serum agglutination testing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were conducted. Whole genome sequencing was applied to characterize 73 Results: Seven serotypes were identified among 73 strains. O10:K4 was the most common serotype (83.6%), followed by O2:KUT, O4:KUT, and O1:KUT. Multilocus sequence typing divided the 73 isolates into 10 sequence types (STs) with ST3 as the most prevalent, which covered all O10:K4 strains. Most isolates were sensitive to common antimicrobial agents apart from colistin. All the O10:K4 isolates were positive for the thermostable direct hemolysin gene, Conclusions: The study confirmed the emergence of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.