Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35812764›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2022

Analysis of Related Factors of Coping Styles in Infertile Patients in Central China.

Jing Mao, Huiping Guo, Juan Wang, Ying Li, Meng Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jing MaoDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Huiping GuoNursing College, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Juan WangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Ying LiDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Meng XuDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the psychosocial factors, including personality characteristics, coping style, social support and alexithymia of infertile patients, and explore the relevant factors regarding the medical coping style choice of infertile patients in central China. Methods: Sixty infertile patients in the reproductive medicine centre in our hospital were investigated using a self-made general situation questionnaire; internal control, powerful others and opportunities scale; social support rating scale; and medical coping questionnaire, and the data was analysed. Results: Of the 60 infertile patients, 57 (95%) were female, with an average age of 27.85 ± 14.52 years old, and 42 (70%) had secondary infertility. The score of the face dimension was lower than the norm (19.17 ± 2.18 vs 19.43 ± 3.82, P = 0.012), and those of the avoidance (15.98 ± 2.43 vs 14.41 ± 2. 94, P = 0.030) and yield (9.48 ± 3.19 vs 8.83 ± 3.19, P = 0.012) dimensions were higher than the norm. The multiple linear regression analysis showed that internal control and the utilisation of support were influencing factors for the coping style (R Conclusion: Considering the association between the coping styles and psychosocial factors, it was recommended to formulate targeted intervention strategies based on these influencing factors to guide patients to adopt positive coping styles and achieve good outcomes.

Indexed as

coping styleinfertilitypsychosocial factorsrelevance

Identifiers

PMID35812764
PMCPMC9258771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.