Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35812681›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2022

Nanotechnology in diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal cancer.

Meng Liang, Li-Dan Li, Liang Li, Shuo Li

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meng LiangDepartment of Otolaryngology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, The sixth Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen 518053, Guangdong Province, China.
Li-Dan LiNational Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518112, Guangdong Province, China.
Liang LiShenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518059, Guangdong Province, China.
Shuo LiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, The sixth Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen 518053, Guangdong Province, China. shuoli@email.szu.edu.cn.
Shenzhen University Health Science Center · CNSouthern University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in nanotechnology have opened new frontiers in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Nanoparticle-based technology improves the precision of tumor diagnosis when combined with imaging, as well as the accuracy of drug target delivery, with fewer side effects. Optimized nanosystems have demonstrated advantages in many fields, including enhanced specificity of detection, reduced toxicity of drugs, enhanced effect of contrast agents, and advanced diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. In this review, we summarize the current nanotechnologies in diagnosis and treatment of GI cancers. The development of nanotechnology will lead to personalized approaches for early diagnosis and treatment of GI cancers.

Indexed as

DiagnosisGastrointestinal cancerNanodevicesNanoparticlesTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID35812681
PMCPMC9210884
OpenAlexW4281645840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.