ArticleCureus2022
Raised Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level as a Risk Factor for Myocardial Infarction in Diabetic Patients: A Hospital-Based, Cross-Sectional Study in Peshawar.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and Impact of Hypothyroidism on Glycaemic Control in Indian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies · 2026Article
- Demographic and metabolic risk factors for non-communicable diseases in Iran: insights from a prospective cohort study.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025Article
- Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Perioperative Glycemic Control in Adult Diabetic Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.Annals of cardiac anaesthesia · 2024Observational
- Article
- Gestational diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for future Type-2 diabetes mellitus: An experience from a tertiary care diabetes hospital, Karachi - Pakistan.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Diabetes is a rapidly rising chronic illness in developing countries. The main objective of this research is to compare the frequency of myocardial infarction (MI) in controlled and uncontrolled diabetics in Pakistan, especially in the underprivileged district of Peshawar, and to determine raised blood glucose as a risk factor for MI. Methodology This cross-sectional study involving 237 diabetic patients aged 30-80 years was conducted in three major tertiary care hospitals in Peshawar, Pakistan. The inclusion criteria were diabetic patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels of less than 7% considered to be "controlled diabetics" and above 7% considered to be "uncontrolled diabetics." Data were collected using structured questionnaires, past medical records, and patient history and were analyzed using SPSS software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The study was concluded in March 2022. Results The highest number of MIs occurred in diabetics with HbA1c levels of 8-9% (47.9% of all MIs). There was a significant association between increasing HbA1c levels and the incidence of MI (p = 0.002). The adjusted prevalence odds ratio for MI in uncontrolled diabetics was 6.105 (95% confidence interval = 2.42-15.43), that is, six times increased incidence of MI in patients with HbA1c of more than 7%. Furthermore, with a 1% increase in HbA1c, there was a 10% increase in the proportion of MIs. Conclusions From this study, it is clear that HbA1c levels of 8-9% were most significantly associated with the risk of MI in uncontrolled diabetics, and with rising levels of HbA1c, the risk of MI increased significantly. Thus, this study highlights the importance of HbA1c control in diabetic patients to prevent a heart attack.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.