ReviewCureus2022
Are There Any Cardioprotective Effects or Safety Concerns of Erythropoietin in Patients With Myocardial Infarction? A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insights into the Effects of Carbamylated Erythropoietin on Schwann Cells in Peripheral Nerve Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Changes and monitoring technology of human heart rate and blood oxygen saturation under high-altitude hypoxia.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Exploring the Structural and Functional Consequences of Deleterious Missense Nonsynonymous SNPs in theJournal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Asialo-rhuEPO as a Potential Neuroprotectant for Ischemic Stroke Treatment.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial infarction (MI) is a global cause of morbidity and mortality. MI is the outcome of a chronic process termed atherosclerosis, a buildup of fatty and other substances called plaques inside the coronary vessels, causing hardening and thickening of the arterial wall. Erythropoietin (EPO) is a pleiotropic cytokine released mainly by the kidneys in adults. Besides its well-known erythropoietic functions, EPO possesses anti-apoptotic, mitogenic, and angiogenic effects. This review aims to analyze the strength of any therapeutic or protective value of EPO on the heart and safety concerns regarding its administration in MI individuals. This systematic review was performed based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Four databases (PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, and Sciences Direct) were employed to search for articles published in the last 10 years. Focused studies were relevant articles in the English language, trials, reviews, meta-analyses, and studies with a control group. Following the quality assessment process, nine studies were eligible and hence were included in the review consisting of six randomized controlled trials and three systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Contrary to preclinical studies, EPO administration did not significantly have notable effects on mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, or infarction size reduction. Significant left ventricle ejection fraction amelioration was not appreciated either. However, EPO seems to reduce the incidence of post-MI arrhythmias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.