Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35812459›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in immunology2022

Humoral and Cellular Immune Response After a 3-Dose Heterologous SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Using the mRNA-BNT162b2 and Viral Vector Ad26COVS1 Vaccine in Hemodialysis Patients.

Tamara Davidovic, Judith Schimpf, Armin Abbassi-Nik, Richard Stockinger, Hannelore Sprenger-Mähr, Karl Lhotta, Emanuel Zitt

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. COVID-19 Vaccines: An Updated Overview of Different Platforms.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tamara DavidovicDepartment of Internal Medicine 3 (Nephrology and Dialysis), Feldkirch Academic Teaching Hospital, Feldkirch, Austria.
Judith SchimpfDepartment of Internal Medicine 3 (Nephrology and Dialysis), Feldkirch Academic Teaching Hospital, Feldkirch, Austria.
Armin Abbassi-NikDepartment of Internal Medicine 3 (Nephrology and Dialysis), Feldkirch Academic Teaching Hospital, Feldkirch, Austria.
Richard StockingerInstitute of Pathology, Feldkirch Academic Teaching Hospital, Feldkirch, Austria.
Hannelore Sprenger-MährDepartment of Internal Medicine 3 (Nephrology and Dialysis), Feldkirch Academic Teaching Hospital, Feldkirch, Austria.
Karl LhottaDepartment of Internal Medicine 3 (Nephrology and Dialysis), Feldkirch Academic Teaching Hospital, Feldkirch, Austria.
Emanuel ZittDepartment of Internal Medicine 3 (Nephrology and Dialysis), Feldkirch Academic Teaching Hospital, Feldkirch, Austria.
Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Due to the waning humoral response after a two-dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, a third booster was recommended in hemodialyis patients. Data on a heterologous mRNA-vector regimen, which might improve immunogenicity, are very limited. Methods: In this observational study 36 chronic hemodialysis patients (mean (SD) age 66.9 (15.9) years, 33.3% females) were followed up for 13 months. All patients were vaccinated twice using the mRNA-BNT162b2 vaccine, followed by a 3 Results: The seroconversion rate was 47.2%, 100%, 69.4% and 100% one month after the 1 Conclusions: A third heterologous booster dose helped to sustain humoral immunity in almost all hemodialysis patients and induced a significant T-cellular response in half of them. Stimulating the immune response against SARS-CoV-2 by two different vaccine platforms seems to be a promising approach.

Indexed as

COVID-19Viral VaccinesAd26COVS1AgedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansImmunity, CellularMaleRenal DialysisRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAd26COVS1Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesRNA, MessengerSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Viral VaccinesAd26COVS1BNT162b2COVID-19hemodialysisSARS-CoV-2vaccination

Identifiers

PMID35812459
PMCPMC9261096
OpenAlexW4283312243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.