Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35812412›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2022

Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccine, WIBP-CorV, in Healthy Children: Interim Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled, Phase 1/2 Trial.

Shengli Xia, Kai Duan, Yuntao Zhang, Xiaoqing Zeng, Dongyang Zhao, Huajun Zhang, Zhiqiang Xie, Xinguo Li, Cheng Peng, Wei Zhang and 28 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Nanocarrier-based immunotherapy for viral diseases.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2025
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Nanomedicine Therapies for Pediatric Diseases.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shengli XiaVaccine Clinical Research Center, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, China.
Kai DuanNational Engineering Technology Research Center for Combined Vaccines, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Yuntao ZhangClinical Medical Center, China National Biotec Group Company Limited, Beijing, China.
Xiaoqing ZengDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Dongyang ZhaoVaccine Clinical Research Center, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, China.
Huajun ZhangChinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Zhiqiang XieVaccine Clinical Research Center, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, China.
Xinguo LiNational Engineering Technology Research Center for Combined Vaccines, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Cheng PengChinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Wei ZhangVaccine Clinical Research Center, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, China.
Yunkai YangClinical Medical Center, China National Biotec Group Company Limited, Beijing, China.
Wei ChenNational Engineering Technology Research Center for Combined Vaccines, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Xiaoxiao GaoChinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Wangyang YouVaccine Clinical Research Center, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, China.
Xuewei WangClinical Medical Center, China National Biotec Group Company Limited, Beijing, China.
Zejun WangNational Engineering Technology Research Center for Combined Vaccines, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Zhengli ShiChinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Yanxia WangVaccine Clinical Research Center, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, China.
Xuqin YangClinical Medical Center, China National Biotec Group Company Limited, Beijing, China.
Qingliang LiNational Engineering Technology Research Center for Combined Vaccines, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Lili HuangVaccine Clinical Research Center, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, China.
Qian WangClinical Medical Center, China National Biotec Group Company Limited, Beijing, China.
Jia LuNational Engineering Technology Research Center for Combined Vaccines, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Yongli YangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jing GuoNational Engineering Technology Research Center for Combined Vaccines, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Wei ZhouNational Engineering Technology Research Center for Combined Vaccines, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Xin WanNational Engineering Technology Research Center for Combined Vaccines, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Cong WuNational Engineering Technology Research Center for Combined Vaccines, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Wenhui WangNational Engineering Technology Research Center for Combined Vaccines, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Shihe HuangNational Engineering Technology Research Center for Combined Vaccines, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Jianhui DuNational Engineering Technology Research Center for Combined Vaccines, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Xuanxuan NianNational Engineering Technology Research Center for Combined Vaccines, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Tao DengNational Engineering Technology Research Center for Combined Vaccines, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Zhiming YuanChinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Shuo ShenNational Engineering Technology Research Center for Combined Vaccines, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Wanshen GuoVaccine Clinical Research Center, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou, China.
Jia LiuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xiaoming YangNational Engineering Technology Research Center for Combined Vaccines, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Henan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNUnion Hospital · CNZhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safe and effective vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 for children are urgently needed. Here we aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine candidate, WIBP-CorV, in participants aged 3-17 years. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial was conducted in Henan Province, China, in healthy children aged 3-17 years. 240 participants in phase 1 trial and 576 participants in phase 2 trial were randomly assigned to vaccine or control with an age de-escalation in three cohorts (3-5, 6-12 and 13-17 years) and dose-escalation in three groups (2.5, 5.0 and 10.0μg/dose), and received 3 intramuscular injections at day 0, 28, and 56. WIBP-CorV showed a promising safety profile with approximately 17% adverse reactions within 30 days after injection and no grade 3 or worse adverse events. The most common adverse reaction was injection site pain, followed by fever, which were mild and self-limiting. The geometric mean titers of neutralizing antibody ranged from 102.2 to 1065.5 in vaccinated participants at 28 days after the third vaccination, and maintained at a range of 14.3 to 218.2 at day 180 after the third vaccination. WIBP-CorV elicited significantly higher titers of neutralizing antibody in the cohort aged 3-5 years than the other two cohorts. There were no detectable antibody responses in all alum-only groups. Taken together, our data demonstrate that WIBP-CorV is safe and well tolerated at all tested doses in participants aged 3-17 years, and elicited robust humoral responses against SARS-CoV-2 lasted for at least 6 months after the third vaccination. This study is ongoing and is registered with www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2000031809.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingChildCOVID-19 VaccinesDouble-Blind MethodHumansSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccineschildrenclinical trialCOVID-19immunogenicityinactivated vaccinesafetySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35812412
PMCPMC9265248
OpenAlexW4283395160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.