Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35812411›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Individuals With Weaker Antibody Responses After Booster Immunization Are Prone to Omicron Breakthrough Infections.

Birte Möhlendick, Ieva Čiučiulkaitė, Carina Elsner, Olympia E Anastasiou, Mirko Trilling, Bernd Wagner, Denise Zwanziger, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Ulf Dittmer, Winfried Siffert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Levels in a Cohort of Health Care Workers Before and After the Omicron Wave in Canada.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The role of immune activation and antigen persistence in acute and long COVID.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Birte MöhlendickInstitute of Pharmacogenetics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Ieva ČiučiulkaitėInstitute of Pharmacogenetics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Carina ElsnerInstitute for Virology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Olympia E AnastasiouInstitute for Virology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Mirko TrillingInstitute for Virology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Bernd WagnerDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Denise ZwanzigerDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Division of Laboratory Research, University-Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Karl-Heinz JöckelInstitute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Ulf DittmerInstitute for Virology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Winfried SiffertInstitute of Pharmacogenetics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
University of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the high level of protection against severe COVID-19 provided by the currently available vaccines some breakthrough infections occur. Until now, there is no information whether a potential risk of a breakthrough infection can be inferred from the level of antibodies after booster vaccination. Methods: Levels of binding antibodies and neutralization capacity after the first, one and six month after the second, and one month after the third (booster) vaccination against COVID-19 were measured in serum samples from 1391 healthcare workers at the University Hospital Essen. Demographics, vaccination scheme, pre-infection antibody titers and neutralization capacity were compared between individuals with and without breakthrough infections. Results: The risk of developing an Omicron breakthrough infection was independent of vaccination scheme, sex, body mass index, smoking status or pre-existing conditions. In participants with low pre-infection anti-spike antibodies (≤ 2641.0 BAU/ml) and weaker neutralization capacity (≤ 65.9%) against Omicron one month after the booster vaccination the risk for developing an Omicron infection was 10-fold increased ( Conclusion: Routine testing of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies and surrogate virus neutralization can quantify vaccine-induced humoral immune response and may help to identify subjects who are at risk for a breakthrough infection. The establishment of thresholds for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels identifying "non"-, "low" and "high"-responders may be used as an indication for re-vaccination.

Indexed as

Antibody FormationCOVID-19Antibodies, ViralHumansImmunization, SecondarySARS-CoV-2Antibodies, Viralanti-spike antibodiesbooster vaccinationbreakthrough infectionCOVID-19humoral immune responseneutralizationSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35812411
PMCPMC9260040
OpenAlexW4283361551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.