Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35812410›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Persistent Antiphospholipid Antibodies Are Not Associated With Worse Clinical Outcomes in a Prospective Cohort of Hospitalised Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Gerard Espinosa, Carles Zamora-Martínez, Albert Pérez-Isidro, Daniela Neto, Luz Yadira Bravo-Gallego, Sergio Prieto-González, Odette Viñas, Ana Belen Moreno-Castaño, Estíbaliz Ruiz-Ortiz, Ricard Cervera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Autoimmune Diseases Affecting Hemostasis: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. COVID-19 and antiphospholipid antibodies.Best practice & research. Clinical haematology · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gerard EspinosaDepartment of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Carles Zamora-MartínezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Albert Pérez-IsidroInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Daniela NetoDepartment of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Luz Yadira Bravo-GallegoDepartment of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Sergio Prieto-GonzálezInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Odette ViñasDepartment of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana Belen Moreno-CastañoInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Estíbaliz Ruiz-OrtizInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ricard CerveraDepartment of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Patients with COVID-19 presented with an elevated prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) but the relationship with thrombosis is controversial. We analysed the persistence of aPL and their association with the clinical outcomes during hospitalisation in a cohort of COVID-19 patients. Patients and Methods: We conducted a prospective study including consecutive hospitalised patients with COVID-19 from Hospital Clínic of Barcelona between March 28th and April 22nd, 2020. Clinical outcomes during hospitalisation were thrombosis, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and severe ventilatory failure. We determined both criteria and non-criteria aPL. Of note, in those patients with a positive result in the first determination, a second sample separated by at least 12 weeks was drawn to test the persistence of aPL. Results: One hundred and fifty-eight patients (59.5% men) with a mean age of 61.4 ± 14.9 years old were included. Thrombosis was present in 28 (17.7%) patients, severe respiratory failure in 47 (30.5%), and 30 (18.9%) patients were admitted to ICU. Sixteen (28.6%) patients were positive for the criteria aPL at both determinations and only two (3.6%) of them suffered from thrombosis during hospitalisations (both had aCL IgG). However, they presented with low titers of aCL. Of note, aPL were not related to thrombosis, ICU admission or severe respiratory failure. Conclusion: Although aPL were prevalent in our cohort of hospitalised COVID-19 patients and they were persistent in half of tested patients, most determinations were at low titers and they were not related to worse clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Antiphospholipid SyndromeCOVID-19Respiratory InsufficiencyThrombosisAgedAntibodies, AntiphospholipidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, Antiphospholipidantiphospholipid antibodiesantiphospholipid syndrome - immunologyCOVID - 19diagnosispersistencesevere respiratory failurethrombosis - immunology

Identifiers

PMID35812410
PMCPMC9257245
OpenAlexW4283277302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.