ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022
Development and Verify of Survival Analysis Models for Chinese Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to develop survival analysis models of hospitalized systemic lupus erythematosus (h-SLE) patients in Jiangsu province using data mining techniques to predict patient survival outcomes and survival status. Methods: In this study, based on 1999-2009 survival data of 2453 hospitalized SLE (h-SLE) patients in Jiangsu Province, we not only used the Cox proportional hazards model to analyze patients' survival factors, but also used neural network models to predict survival outcomes. We used semi-supervised learning to label the censored data and introduced cost-sensitivity to achieve data augmentation, addressing category imbalance and pseudo label credibility. In addition, the risk score model was developed by logistic regression. Results: The overall accuracy of the survival outcome prediction model exceeded 0.7, and the sensitivity was close to 0.8, and through the comparative analysis of multiple indicators, our model outperformed traditional classifiers. The developed survival risk assessment model based on logistic regression found that there was a clear threshold, i.e., a survival threshold indicating the survival risk of patients, and cardiopulmonary and neuropsychiatric involvement, abnormal blood urea nitrogen levels and alanine aminotransferase level had the greatest impact on patient survival time. In addition, the study developed a graphical user interface (GUI) integrating survival analysis models to assist physicians in diagnosis and treatment. Conclusions: The proposed survival analysis scheme identifies disease-related pathogenic and prognosis factors, and has the potential to improve the effectiveness of clinical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.