Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35812364›Full record

ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Once an optimist, always an optimist? Studying cognitive judgment bias in mice.

Marko Bračić, Lena Bohn, Viktoria Siewert, Vanessa T von Kortzfleisch, Holger Schielzeth, Sylvia Kaiser, Norbert Sachser, S Helene Richter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Optimism and pessimism: a concept for behavioural ecology.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Once an optimist, always an optimist? Studying cognitive judgment bias in mice.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marko BračićDepartment of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6528-3572
Lena BohnDepartment of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5946-6858
Viktoria SiewertDepartment of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5787-9288
Vanessa T von KortzfleischDepartment of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4191-4434
Holger SchielzethInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9124-2261
Sylvia KaiserDepartment of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2770-7367
Norbert SachserDepartment of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4951-4016
S Helene RichterDepartment of Behavioural Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5990-0087
University of Münster · DEFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals differ in the way they judge ambiguous information: some individuals interpret ambiguous information in a more optimistic, and others in a more pessimistic way. Over the past two decades, such "optimistic" and "pessimistic" cognitive judgment biases (CJBs) have been utilized in animal welfare science as indicators of animals' emotional states. However, empirical studies on their ecological and evolutionary relevance are still lacking. We, therefore, aimed at transferring the concept of "optimism" and "pessimism" to behavioral ecology and investigated the role of genetic and environmental factors in modulating CJB in mice. In addition, we assessed the temporal stability of individual differences in CJB. We show that the chosen genotypes (C57BL/6J and B6D2F1N) and environments ("scarce" and "complex") did not have a statistically significant influence on the responses in the CJB test. By contrast, they influenced anxiety-like behavior with C57BL/6J mice and mice from the "complex" environment displaying less anxiety-like behavior than B6D2F1N mice and mice from the "scarce" environment. As the selected genotypes and environments did not explain the existing differences in CJB, future studies might investigate the impact of other genotypes and environmental conditions on CJB, and additionally, elucidate the role of other potential causes like endocrine profiles and epigenetic modifications. Furthermore, we show that individual differences in CJB were repeatable over a period of seven weeks, suggesting that CJB represents a temporally stable trait in laboratory mice. Therefore, we encourage the further study of CJB within an animal personality framework.

Indexed as

animal personalityanxietybehavioral repeatabilitycognitive biasdecision-making under ambiguitygenotype-environment interactionjudgement biasspatial learning

Identifiers

PMID35812364
PMCPMC9262167
OpenAlexW4225602275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.