Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35812233›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

tDCS-EEG for Predicting Outcome in Patients With Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome.

Baohu Liu, Xu Zhang, Yuanyuan Li, Guoping Duan, Jun Hou, Jiayi Zhao, Tongtong Guo, Dongyu Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Baohu LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xu ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yuanyuan LiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Guoping DuanDepartment of Rehabilitation, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jun HouDepartment of Rehabilitation, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jiayi ZhaoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Tongtong GuoGraduate School, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Dongyu WuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to assess the role of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with electroencephalogram (EEG) for predicting prognosis in UWS cases. Methods: This was a historical control study that enrolled 85 patients with UWS. The subjects were assigned to the control (without tDCS) and tDCS groups. Conventional treatments were implemented in both the control and tDCS groups, along with 40 multi-target tDCS sessions only in the tDCS group. Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) was applied at admission. The non-linear EEG index was evaluated after treatment. The modified Glasgow Outcome Scale (mGOS) was applied 12 months after disease onset. Results: The mGOS improvement rate in the tDCS group (37.1%) was higher than the control value (22.0%). Linear regression analysis revealed that the local and remote cortical networks under unaffected pain stimulation conditions and the remote cortical network under affected pain stimulation conditions were the main relevant factors for mGOS improvement. Furthermore, the difference in prefrontal-parietal cortical network was used to examine the sensitivity of prognostic assessment in UWS patients. The results showed that prognostic sensitivity could be increased from 54.5% (control group) to 84.6% (tDCS group). Conclusions: This study proposes a tDCS-EEG protocol for predicting the prognosis of UWS. With multi-target tDCS combined with EEG, the sensitivity of prognostic assessment in patients with UWS was improved. The recovery might be related to improved prefrontal-parietal cortical networks of the unaffected hemisphere.

Indexed as

disorder of consciousnesselectroencephalogramnon-linear dynamicsprognosistranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35812233
PMCPMC9263392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.