ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2022
A simple predictive model with internal validation for assessment of stone-left after ureteroscopic lithotripsy in upper ureteral stones.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the effects of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in patients with upper ureteral impacted stones with infection.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Assessing the Predictive Accuracy of the S.T.O.N.E. Score for Stone-Free Rates in Semirigid Pneumatic Ureteral Lithotripsy: Implications for Validation.Research and reports in urology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of sexual stimulation in the treatment of distal ureteral stones: A meta-analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- What are the predictors of residual stone after ureteroscopy for urolithiasis?Translational andrology and urology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stone free rate in upper ureteral stones is not as high. We sought to identify easily accessible risk factors attributing to stones left in the ureteroscopy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi, and to build a simple and reliable predictive model. Methods: Patients treating only for upper ureteral stones in 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Correlations between factors and the stone free rate were analyzed using bidirectional stepwise regression, curve fitting and binary logistic regression. Stone shape was judged by the gap between length and width in the two-dimensional section. A predictive nomogram model was built based on those selected variables (P<0.05). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration curve were used to access its discrimination and calibration. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted to test the clinical usefulness. Results: Totally, 275 patients with 284 stones were enrolled in this research. Bidirectional stepwise regression showed that stone length had a significant effect on stone free, instead of width or burden. Stone shapes were also found playing a big role. Curve fitting showed that quasi-circular stones had a high risk of retropulsion, and eventually led to stone left. Finally, stone length, shape, modality, and the distance of stones to the ureteropelvic junction were enrolled in the model. Among them, the distance of the stone to the ureteropelvic junction showed a noticeable impact on stone left. AUC was 0.803 (95% CI: 0.730-0.876), and the calibration curve showed good calibration of the model (concordance index, 0.792). DCA indicated the model added net benefit to patients. Conclusions: The present predictive model based on those factors, stones length, shape, modality, and distance of the stone to the ureteropelvic junction was easy, reliable and useful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.