Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35812101›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2022

Carmustine Wafers Implantation in Patients With Newly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma: Is It Still an Option?

Luca Ricciardi, Ivana Manini, Daniela Cesselli, Sokol Trungu, Amedeo Piazza, Antonella Mangraviti, Massimo Miscusi, Antonino Raco, Tamara Ius

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Luca RicciardiUOC di Neurochirurgia, Department of NESMOS, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Ivana ManiniInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Daniela CesselliInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Sokol TrunguUO di Neurochirurgia, Azienda Ospedaliera Cardinal G. Panico, Tricase, Italy.
Amedeo PiazzaUOC di Neurochirurgia, Department of NESMOS, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Antonella MangravitiUOC di Neurochirurgia, Department of NESMOS, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Massimo MiscusiUOC di Neurochirurgia, Department of NESMOS, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Antonino RacoUOC di Neurochirurgia, Department of NESMOS, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Tamara IusNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, S. Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Udine · ITAzienda Ospedaliera S.Maria · ITOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The implantation protocol for Carmustine Wafers (CWs) in high grade glioma (HGG) was developed to offer a bridge between surgical resection and adjuvant treatments, such as radio- and chemotherapy. In the last years, however, a widespread use of CWs has been limited due to uncertainties regarding efficacy, in addition to increased risk of infection and elevated costs of treatment. Objective: The aims of our study were to investigate the epidemiology of patients that underwent surgery for HGG with CW implantation, in addition to the assessment of related complications, long-term overall survival ( Methods: Three different medical databases were screened for conducting a systematic review of the literature, according to the PRISMA statement guidelines, evaluating the role of BCNU wafer implantation in patients with newly diagnosed HGG. The search query was based on a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH): "high grade glioma" [MeSH] AND "Carmustine" [MeSH] and free text terms: "surgery" OR "BCNU wafer" OR "Gliadel" OR "systemic treatment options" OR "overall survival." Results: The analysis of the meta-data demonstrated that there was a significant advantage in using CWs in newly diagnosed GBM in terms of Conclusions: This meta-analysis seems to suggest that CWs implantation plays a significant role in improving the

Indexed as

Carmustinecomplicationsextent of resectionglioma surgeryoverall survival

Identifiers

PMID35812101
PMCPMC9259966
OpenAlexW4283311909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.