Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35812048›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2022

5-year recurrence prediction after hepatocellular carcinoma resection: deep learning vs. Cox regression models.

Hon-Yi Shi, King-The Lee, Chong-Chi Chiu, Jhi-Joung Wang, Ding-Ping Sun, Hao-Hsien Lee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hon-Yi ShiDepartment of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, Kaohsiung Medical University Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan.
King-The LeeDepartment of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, Kaohsiung Medical University Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan.
Chong-Chi ChiuDepartment of General Surgery, E-Da Cancer Hospital Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan.
Jhi-Joung WangDepartment of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center Yongkang, Tainan 71004, Taiwan.
Ding-Ping SunDepartment of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center Yongkang, Tainan 71004, Taiwan.
Hao-Hsien LeeDepartment of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center Liouying, Tainan 73658, Taiwan.
China Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning algorithms have yet to be used for predicting clinical prognosis after cancer surgery. Therefore, this study compared performance indices and permutation importance of potential confounders in three models for predicting 5-year recurrence after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) resection: a deep-learning deep neural network (DNN) model, a recurrent neural network (RNN) model, and a Cox proportional hazard (CPH) regression model. Data for 725 patients who had received HCC resection at three medical centers in southern Taiwan between April, 2011, and December, 2015, were randomly divided into three datasets: a training dataset containing data for 507 subjects was used for model development, a testing dataset containing data for 109 subjects was used for internal validation, and a validating dataset containing data for 109 subjects was used for external validation. Feature importance analysis was also performed to identify potential predictors of recurrence after HCC resection. Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to identify potential significant predictors of 5-year recurrence after HCC resection, which were included in the forecasting models (

Indexed as

deep learningfeature importanceHepatocellular carcinomarecurrenceresection

Identifiers

PMID35812048
PMCPMC9251698
OpenAlexW4285048611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.