Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35812041›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2022

A detailed assessment of liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma via the modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade.

Cheng-Rui Zhong, Ji-Liang Qiu, Yi-Chuan Yuan, Zhi-Yu Qiu, Kai Li, Chen-Wei Wang, Yun-Xing Shi, Ke-Ren Li, Zhu Lin, Zhen-Kun Huang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Cheng-Rui ZhongState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ji-Liang QiuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yi-Chuan YuanState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhi-Yu QiuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Kai LiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Chen-Wei WangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yun-Xing ShiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ke-Ren LiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhu LinState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhen-Kun HuangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Wei HeState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Bin-Kui LiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yun-Fei YuanState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, a continuous index consisting of only albumin and bilirubin, has been developed for objectively assessing liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the ALBI score was arbitrarily categorized into three ALBI grades based on two artificially predetermined cutoff points with no explanation and statistical grounds, causing a considerable loss of discriminatory ability. This study aims to propose a modified ALBI (mALBI) grade for offering a detailed evaluation of hepatic reserve and specify its role during clinical practice in the HCC setting. The study population comprised 3540 HCC patients treated with mainstream therapies including hepatectomy (n=2056), thermal ablation (n=550), and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (n=934) from 2002 to 2017. The ALBI score was stratified into four mALBI grades through a recently proposed statistical method aiming to select the optimal cutoff points of a continuous predictive variable by maximizing the discriminative ability in a multivariable Cox regression model. The mALBI grade had an overall better discriminatory ability than the ALBI grade in predicting overall survival through Harrell's C-index (0.614 vs. 0.598, P<0.001). Both visual inspections of Kaplan-Meier curves and calculation of hazard ratios displayed a more subtle evaluation of liver function using the mALBI grade. Moreover, the newly identified cut-point (ALBI score = -2.29) between the mALBI grade 2a and 2b was much closer to a 30% retention rate of indocyanine green at 15 minutes, an indicator for the performance of a subsegmentectomy. The newly proposed mALBI grade provides a more subtle assessment of liver function to guide clinical decision-making and predicts the prognosis of HCC patients more accurately than the original ALBI grade.

Indexed as

ALBI gradehepatocellular carcinomaLiver functionmALBI gradeprognosis

Identifiers

PMID35812041
PMCPMC9251706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.