ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2022
A detailed assessment of liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma via the modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Changes in Serum AFP, Albumin and ALBI after Radioembolization in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma with High or Low Alpha-Fetoprotein Levels.Japanese journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Article
- Prognostic Nutritional Index Correlates with Liver Function and Prognosis in Chronic Liver Disease Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, a continuous index consisting of only albumin and bilirubin, has been developed for objectively assessing liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the ALBI score was arbitrarily categorized into three ALBI grades based on two artificially predetermined cutoff points with no explanation and statistical grounds, causing a considerable loss of discriminatory ability. This study aims to propose a modified ALBI (mALBI) grade for offering a detailed evaluation of hepatic reserve and specify its role during clinical practice in the HCC setting. The study population comprised 3540 HCC patients treated with mainstream therapies including hepatectomy (n=2056), thermal ablation (n=550), and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (n=934) from 2002 to 2017. The ALBI score was stratified into four mALBI grades through a recently proposed statistical method aiming to select the optimal cutoff points of a continuous predictive variable by maximizing the discriminative ability in a multivariable Cox regression model. The mALBI grade had an overall better discriminatory ability than the ALBI grade in predicting overall survival through Harrell's C-index (0.614 vs. 0.598, P<0.001). Both visual inspections of Kaplan-Meier curves and calculation of hazard ratios displayed a more subtle evaluation of liver function using the mALBI grade. Moreover, the newly identified cut-point (ALBI score = -2.29) between the mALBI grade 2a and 2b was much closer to a 30% retention rate of indocyanine green at 15 minutes, an indicator for the performance of a subsegmentectomy. The newly proposed mALBI grade provides a more subtle assessment of liver function to guide clinical decision-making and predicts the prognosis of HCC patients more accurately than the original ALBI grade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35812041PMC9251706What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.