ArticleACS omega2022
Effects of Different Radiation Sources on the Performance of Collagen-Based Corneal Repair Materials and Macrophage Polarization.
Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tissue-Cultured Chondrocytes Survive After Irradiation in 1300 Gy Dose.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Preparation and Characterization of a Photo-Crosslinked Methacryloyl-Collagen Composite Film to Promote Corneal Nerve Regeneration via Surface Grafting of Taurine Molecules.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Owing to the lack of donor corneas, there is an urgent need for suitable corneal substitutes. As the main component of the corneal stroma, collagen has great advantages as a corneal repair material. If there are microorganisms such as bacteria in the corneal repair material, it may induce postoperative infection, causing the failure of corneal transplantation. Therefore, irradiation, as a common sterilization method, is often used to control the microorganisms in the material. However, it has not been reported which type of radiation source and what doses can sterilize more effectively without affecting the properties of collagen-based corneal repair materials (CCRMs) and have a positive impact on macrophage polarization. In this study, three different radiation sources of ultraviolet, cobalt-60, and electron beam at four different doses of 2, 5, 8, and 10 kGy were used to irradiate CCRMs. The swelling, stretching, transmittance, and degradation of the irradiated CCRMs were characterized, and the proliferation of human corneal epithelial cells on the irradiated CCRMs was characterized using the CCK8 kit. The results showed that low dose (<5 kGy) of radiation had little effect on the performance of CCRMs. Three irradiation methods with less influence were selected for the further study on RAW264.7 macrophage polarization. The results indicated that CCRMs treated with UV could downregulate the expression of pro-inflammatory related genes and upregulate the expression of anti-inflammatory genes in macrophages, which indicated that UV irradiation is a beneficial process for the preparation of CCRMs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.