Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35811777›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2022

Relationship Between the Use of Preprinted Physician Orders for Hospital-Acquired Fever and Time to Blood Culture Collection: A Single-Center Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Taku Harada, Shintaro Kosaka, Juichi Hiroshige, Takashi Watari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taku HaradaDivision of General Medicine, Showa Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8794-6744
Shintaro KosakaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nerima Hikarigaoka Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Juichi HiroshigeDivision of General Medicine, Showa Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi WatariGeneral Medicine Center, Shimane University Hospital, Shimane, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9322-8455

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Fever is relatively common in patients admitted to general wards. There is no standardized approach, and little is known about how physicians respond to fever. Additionally, preprinted physician orders are routinely used clinically in hospital medicine, and it is not clear how preprinted physician orders for fever affect the care of patients with fever. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether preprinted physician orders for inpatients have an effect on the time from fever measurement to blood culture collection. Patients and Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study of patients with bacteremia. Between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019, 137 hospitalized febrile patients diagnosed with bacteremia by blood culture prepared from blood collected 72 h after hospitalization were included. Results: Preprinted physician orders with instructions to call the physician if the patient has a fever were present for 59 patients. For preprinted physician orders with instructions to notify the physician about fever onset, 62.7% of the blood cultures were collected within 1 h of fever observation; when preprinted orders were not used, only 23.1% met the 1-h collection criterion. Multivariate analysis showed that preprinted physician orders were significantly associated with blood culture collection within 1 h from the reporting of fever (odds ratio, 4.94; 95% confidence interval, 2.27-10.70). Conclusion: Preprinted physician orders with instructions to notify the physician about fever onset were present for only 40% of our sample, and this was related to the time of blood culture collection.

Indexed as

bacteremiahospital-acquired feverpreprinted physician orders

Identifiers

PMID35811777
PMCPMC9259055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.