Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35811746›Full record

ReviewTremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.)2022

Surgical Outcomes in Rare Movement Disorders: A Report of Seventeen Patients from India and Review of Literature.

Debjyoti Dhar, Vikram Venkappayya Holla, Nitish Kamble, Ravi Yadav, Dwarakanath Srinivas, Pramod Kumar Pal

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Current Management of Neurological Wilson's Disease.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Review
  5. Clinical neurophysiology in the treatment of movement disorders: IFCN handbook chapter.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Debjyoti DharDepartment of Neurology, National institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS, India - 560029), IN.ORCID 0000-0002-4835-4698
Vikram Venkappayya HollaDepartment of Neurology, National institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS, India - 560029), IN.ORCID 0000-0002-3634-2219
Nitish KambleDepartment of Neurology, National institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS, India - 560029), IN.ORCID 0000-0002-7933-8826
Ravi YadavDepartment of Neurology, National institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS, India - 560029), IN.ORCID 0000-0002-8016-9089
Dwarakanath SrinivasNeurosurgery, National institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS, India - 560029), IN.ORCID 0000-0001-7330-0627
Pramod Kumar PalDepartment of Neurology, National institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS, India - 560029), IN.ORCID 0000-0002-4085-2377
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rare movement disorders (RMDs) throw remarkable challenges to their appropriate management particularly when they are medically refractory. We studied the outcome of functional neurosurgery among patients with RMDs. Methods: Retrospective chart-review from 2006 to 2021 of patients with RMDs who underwent either Deep brain Stimulation (DBS) or lesional surgeries in the department of Neurology and Neurosurgery at a tertiary care centre. Results: Seventeen patients were included. Generalized dystonia (11 patients, 64.7%) and tremor (5 patients, 29.4%) were the most common indication for surgery whereas, Wilson's disease (8 patients, 47.1%) and Neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation (5 patients, 29.4%) were the most common aetiology. Sixteen patients (94.1%) had objective clinical improvement. Significant improvement was noted in the dystonia motor scores both at 6-months and 12-months follow-up (n = 11, p-value of <0.01 and 0.01 respectively). Comparison between DBS and lesional surgery showed no significant difference in the outcomes (p = 0.95 at 6-months and p = 0.53 at 12-months), with slight worsening of scores in the DBS arm at 12-months. Among five patients of refractory tremor with Wilson's disease, there was remarkable improvement in the tremor scores by 85.0 ± 7.8% at the last follow-up. Speech impairment was the main complication observed with most of the other adverse events either transient or reversible. Discussion: Surgical options should be contemplated among patients with disabling medically refractory RMDs irrespective of the aetiology. Key to success lies in appropriate patient selection. In situations when DBS is not feasible, lesional surgeries can offer an excellent alternative with comparable efficacy and safety.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationDystoniaDystonic DisordersHepatolenticular DegenerationMovement DisordersHumansIndiaRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTremorDBSFunctional neurosurgerypallidotomyRare movement disordersthalamotomy

Identifiers

PMID35811746
PMCPMC9231568
OpenAlexW4285018281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.