Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35811695›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

The German EMPATHIC-30 Questionnaire Showed Reliability and Convergent Validity for Use in an Intermediary/General Pediatric Cardiology Unit: A Psychometric Evaluation.

Alona Girch, Ralph C A Rippe, Jos M Latour, Michaela Jönebratt Stocker, Magdalena Blendermann, Katharina Hoffmann, Hannes Heppner, Felix Berger, Katharina R L Schmitt, Hannah Ferentzi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Alona GirchDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ralph C A RippeResearch Methods and Statistics, Institute of Education and Child Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Jos M LatourSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Michaela Jönebratt StockerDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Magdalena BlendermannDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Katharina HoffmannCharité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hannes HeppnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United States.
Felix BergerDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Katharina R L SchmittDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hannah FerentziDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DELeiden University · NLUniversity of Montana · USUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Family-Centered Care is a useful framework for improving care for hospitalized children with congenital heart disease. The EMpowerment of PArents in THe Intensive Care-30 (EMPATHIC-30) questionnaire is a widely accepted tool to measure parental satisfaction with Family-Centered Care. Psychometric properties of the EMPATHIC-30 have been evaluated in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units, but not in pediatric cardiac care units. Therefore, our aim was to assess the psychometric properties of the German EMPATHIC-30 in an intermediary/general pediatric cardiology unit. Methods: We used data from a quality management survey comprising the German EMPATHIC-30, a sociodemographic questionnaire and four general satisfaction items. Data were collected at the intermediary/general pediatric cardiology unit of a specialized heart center in Germany ( Results: The reliability estimates exceeded 0.70 for all five domain scores and 0.90 for the full-scale score. Convergent validity between EMPATHIC-30 domain scores/ the full-scale score and the four general satisfaction items was adequate (r Discussion: The German version of the EMPATHIC-30 exhibited reasonable psychometric properties in an intermediary/general pediatric cardiology unit. Follow-up studies should investigate the factor structure of the EMPATHIC-30 in other pediatric inpatient care settings.

Indexed as

congenital heart diseaseconstruct validityconvergent validityfamily-centered careinternal consistency reliabilitypediatric cardiologypsychometric properties

Identifiers

PMID35811695
PMCPMC9262329
OpenAlexW4283311745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.