ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Duct Stenting vs. Modified Blalock-Taussig Shunt: New Insights Learned From High-Risk Patients With Duct-Dependent Pulmonary Circulation.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ductal Stenting Versus Aorto-Pulmonary Shunt for Lesions with Duct-Dependent Pulmonary Blood Flow: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Review
- [Ductal stenting versus Blalock-Taussig-Thomas fistula in a Latin-American country].Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2025Article
- Primary transcatheter dilation of the pulmonary valve in cyanotic patients with tetralogy of Fallot and dominant pulmonary valve stenosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Stenting of high-tortuous ducts in duct-dependent pulmonary circulation: essential points to consider before deciding on stenting.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Three-dimensional/four-dimensional spatiotemporal image correlation morphology of the ductus arteriosus in fetuses with pulmonary atresia undergoing neonatal ductal stenting.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As no data were available on the comparison of outcomes between modified Blalock-Taussig shunts (MBTs) vs. duct-stenting (DS) in patients with pulmonary atresia (PA) and an increased ductal tortuosity and in patients with pulmonary atresia and intact septum (PA-IVS) with right ventricle-dependent coronary circulation (RVDCC), we aimed to perform a single-center retrospective evaluation. Methods: Between 2010 and 2019, 127 patients with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation (DDPC) underwent either MBTs (without additional repairs) ( Results: The primary outcome was achieved equally in the two groups (77.5% in DS, 75% in MBTs). Hospital deaths, need for ECMO, and the occurrence of major complications was more frequent in the group with MBTs with an Odds Ratio (OR) of 5, 0.8, and 4, respectively, and a 95% Confidence Interval ( Conclusion: MBTs showed a better outcome in patients with tortuous ducts compared to DS. DS seems to be superior in patients with DDPC with DCI <0.45 and patients with PA-IVS with RVDCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.