Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35810936›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2022

A comparison of high-grade cervical abnormality risks in women living with and without human immunodeficiency virus undergoing routine cervical-cancer screening.

Philip E Castle, Brian Befano, Mark Schiffman, Nicolas Wentzensen, Thomas Lorey, Nancy Poitras, Marianne Hyer, Li C Cheung

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Philip E CastleDivision of Cancer Prevention, U.S. National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, U.S. National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA. Electronic address: philip.castle@nih.gov.
Brian BefanoInformation Management Services, Calverton, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mark SchiffmanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, U.S. National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Nicolas WentzensenDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, U.S. National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Thomas LoreyKaiser Permanante, The Permanante Medical Group Regional Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Nancy PoitrasKaiser Permanante, The Permanante Medical Group Regional Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Marianne HyerInformation Management Services, Calverton, MD, USA.
Li C CheungDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, U.S. National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
National Cancer Institute · USDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsInformation Management Services · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Developing Data-Driven Cancer ResearchersT32CA009168 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STEPHEN M SCHWARTZ, MICHAEL Chiao-An WU · 1985 to 2026
$10.1M
Global Cancer HealthZIACP101237 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI CASTLE, PHILIP · 2022 to 2025
$6.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CP101237NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the US moves increasingly towards using human papillomavirus (HPV) testing with or without concurrent cytology for cervical cancer screening, it is unknown what the corresponding risks are following a screening result for women living with HIV (WLWH), which will dictate the optimal clinical follow-up. Therefore, using medical records data from Kaiser Permanente Northern California, which introduced triennial HPV and cytology co-testing in women aged 30-64 years in 2003, we compared risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) or more severe diagnoses (CIN2+) in women not known to have HIV (HIV[-] women) (n = 67,488) frequency matched 111:1 on age and year of the first co-test to the 608 WLWH (n = 608). WLWH were more likely to test HPV positive (20.2% vs. 6.5%, p < 0.001) and have non-normal cytology (14.1% vs. 4.1%, p < 0.001) than HIV[-] women. Five-year CIN2+ risks for all WLWH and HIV[-] women were 3.5% (95%CI = 2.0-5.0%) and 1.6% (95%CI = 1.5-1.8%) (p = 0.01), respectively. Five-year CIN2+ risks for WLWH with positive HPV and non-normal cytology, positive HPV and normal cytology, negative HPV and non-normal cytology, and negative HPV and normal cytology were 24.9% (95%CI = 13.4-36.4%), 3.0% (95%CI = 0.0-7.4%), 3.6 (95%CI = 0.0-9.8%) and 0.3% (95%CI = 0.0-0.8%), respectively. Corresponding 5-year CIN2+ risks for HIV[-] women were 26.6% (95%CI = 24.6-28.7%), 8.5% (95%CI = 7.2-9.9%), 1.9% (95%CI = 1.0-2.8%), and 0.5% (95%CI = 0.4-0.6%), respectively. Thus, in this healthcare setting, the main cause in overall CIN2+ risk differences between WLWH and HIV[-] women was the former was more likely to screen positive and once the screening result is known, it may be reasonable to manage both populations similarly.

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusHIV InfectionsPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHIVHumansMass ScreeningPapillomaviridaeVaginal SmearsCervical cancerCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaCytologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Human papillomavirus (HPV)Pap

Identifiers

PMID35810936
PMCPMC9388588
OpenAlexW4284965440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.