Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35810599›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatric research2022

What about mental health after one year of COVID-19 pandemic? A comparison with the initial peak.

Lorena García-Fernández, Verónica Romero-Ferreiro, Victoria Rodríguez, Miguel A Alvarez-Mon, Guillermo Lahera, Roberto Rodriguez-Jimenez

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatric research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. PeerJ · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lorena García-FernándezClinical Medicine Department, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Ctra. de Valencia, Km 87, 03550, San Juan, Alicante, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario de San Juan, Ctra, N-332, s/n, 03550, San Juan, Alicante, Spain; CIBERSAM (Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Mental Health), Spain. Electronic address: lorena.garciaf@umh.es.
Verónica Romero-FerreiroCIBERSAM (Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Mental Health), Spain; Department of Psychology, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Av. Córdoba s/n, 28041, Madrid, Spain.
Victoria RodríguezDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, United Kingdom.
Miguel A Alvarez-MonDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, University of Alcala, 28801, Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain; Ramón y Cajal Institute of Sanitary Research (IRYCIS), 28034, Madrid, Spain; Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
Guillermo LaheraCIBERSAM (Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Mental Health), Spain; Department of Medicine and Medical Specialities, University of Alcala, 28801, Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain; Ramón y Cajal Institute of Sanitary Research (IRYCIS), 28034, Madrid, Spain; Príncipe de Asturias University Hospital, Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Roberto Rodriguez-JimenezCIBERSAM (Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Mental Health), Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Av. Córdoba s/n, 28041, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Plaza Ramón y Cajal, s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESUniversidad de Alcalá · ESKing's College London · GBUniversitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A psychiatric epidemic has accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic and specific vulnerable populations have been identified. We aimed to explore the presence of anxiety, acute stress and depression among these vulnerable groups after a year of pandemic and relate them to our previous results obtained with the same methodology during the initial peak of the pandemic in Spain. A total of 2182 participants conducted a national survey, starting on March 2021. Sociodemographic information and clinical symptoms were assessed. The sample was divided into four groups in order to develop four substudies with these results: 1) Healthcare workers presented lower anxiety, acute stress, and depression than non-Healthcare workers (p < 0.001), being nurses the most affected. 2) People with mental disorders experienced higher anxiety, acute stress, and depression than people without (p < 0.001), as well as a higher rate of COVID cases (14% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.041). 3) People ≥60 years old presented lower anxiety and acute stress than people <60, (p < 0.05) and a weaker depressive syndrome (p = 0.003). 4) Males presented lower anxiety, acute stress and depression than females (p < 0.001). According to the results obtained during the initial peak, Healthcare workers have developed efficient coping strategies, while elders have managed to maintain their previously emotional balance. Notwithstanding, women and people with mental disorders continue to be vulnerable to emotional distress after a year of pandemic. Women and people with mental disorders continue to be especially vulnerable to emotional distress after a year of pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19ElderlyGender differencesHealthcare workersMental disorders

Identifiers

PMID35810599
PMCPMC9254135
OpenAlexW4283803994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.