ArticleNeurobiology of aging2022
Age-related strengthening of cerebello-cortical motor circuits.
Article in Neurobiology of aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bibliometric and visualised analysis on non-invasive cerebellar stimulation from 1995 to 2021.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Pooled it
- Enhancing Balance Control in Aging Through Cerebellar Theta-Burst Stimulation.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Trial
- Time-Dependent Enhancement of Motor Dexterity and Cerebellar Function via Premotor-Cerebellar Associative Stimulation.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Cerebellar Brain Inhibition and Its Association with Motor Inhibition and Reaction Time In Younger and Older Adults.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
- GABA, Glx, and GSH in the cerebellum: their role in motor performance and learning across age groups.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Bimanual coordinated motor skill learning in patients with a chronic cerebellar stroke.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurological disorders. Updated report of an IFCN committee.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023Review
- Neurophysiology of cerebellar ataxias and gait disorders.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Effective connectivity between the cerebellum and primary motor cortex (M1) is critical for motor learning and motor control. Despite evidence of cerebellar atrophy and declines in motor learning and motor control with advanced age, recent behavioral studies indicate that cerebellar-dependent motor learning processes are preserved or even enhanced in older adults. However, physiological evidence of heightened cerebellar excitability leading to strengthened cerebellar-M1 connectivity with advanced age is lacking. Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess age-related effects on cerebellar inhibition, a measure of cerebellar-M1 connectivity, in 20 young and 19 older adults. We observed stronger cerebellar inhibition in older compared with young adults. The behavioral implications of strengthened cerebellar inhibition with advanced age found in this study remain to be determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.