Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35810330›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2022

Interrogating the substrate specificity landscape of UvrC reveals novel insights into its non-canonical function.

Manoj Thakur, Rishikesh S Parulekar, Sagar S Barale, Kailas D Sonawane, Kalappa Muniyappa

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Manoj ThakurDepartment of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India. Electronic address: manojt@iisc.ac.in.
Rishikesh S ParulekarStructural Bioinformatics Unit, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, India.
Sagar S BaraleStructural Bioinformatics Unit, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, India.
Kailas D SonawaneDepartment of Microbiology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, India; Structural Bioinformatics Unit, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, India.
Kalappa MuniyappaDepartment of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India. Electronic address: kmbc@iisc.ac.in.
Shivaji University · INIndian Institute of Management Bangalore · INIndian Institute of Science Bangalore · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it is relatively unexplored, accumulating data highlight the importance of tripartite crosstalk between nucleotide excision repair (NER), DNA replication, and recombination in the maintenance of genome stability; however, elucidating the underlying mechanisms remains challenging. While Escherichia coli uvrA and uvrB can fully complement polAΔ cells in DNA replication, uvrC attenuates this alternative DNA replication pathway, but the exact mechanism by which uvrC suppresses DNA replication is unknown. Furthermore, the identity of bona fide canonical and non-canonical substrates for UvrCs are undefined. Here, we reveal that Mycobacterium tuberculosis UvrC (MtUvrC) strongly binds to, and robustly cleaves, key intermediates of DNA replication/recombination as compared with the model NER substrates. Notably, inactivation of MtUvrC ATPase activity significantly attenuated its endonuclease activity, thus suggesting a causal link between these two functions. We built an in silico model of the interaction of MtUvrC with the Holliday junction (HJ), using a combination of homology modeling, molecular docking, and molecular dynamic simulations. The model predicted residues that were potentially involved in HJ binding. Six of these residues were mutated either singly or in pairs, and the resulting MtUvrC variants were purified and characterized. Among them, residues Glu595 and Arg597 in the helix-hairpin-helix motif were found to be crucial for the interaction between MtUvrC and HJ; consequently, mutations in these residues, or inhibition of ATP hydrolysis, strongly abrogated its DNA-binding and endonuclease activities. Viewed together, these findings expand the substrate specificity landscape of UvrCs and provide crucial mechanistic insights into the interplay between NER and DNA replication/recombination.

Indexed as

EndodeoxyribonucleasesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsDNA DamageDNA RepairMolecular Docking SimulationSubstrate SpecificityEndodeoxyribonucleasesEscherichia coli ProteinsUvrC protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID35810330
PMCPMC9463653
OpenAlexW4284974941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.