Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35810302›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Explaining regional variation in elective hip and knee arthroplasties in Finland 2010 - 2017-a register-based cohort study.

Kristiina Manderbacka, Markku Satokangas, Martti Arffman, Eeva Reissell, Ilmo Keskimäki, Alastair H Leyland

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristiina ManderbackaWelfare State Research and Reform Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare(THL), P.O.Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland. kristiina.manderbacka@thl.fi.
Markku SatokangasWelfare State Research and Reform Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare(THL), P.O.Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Martti ArffmanWelfare State Research and Reform Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare(THL), P.O.Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Eeva ReissellWelfare State Research and Reform Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare(THL), P.O.Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Ilmo KeskimäkiWelfare State Research and Reform Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare(THL), P.O.Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Alastair H LeylandMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FITampere University · FIUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

Academy of Finland 312 708Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/2Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office SPHSU17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA persistent research finding in industrialised countries has been regional variation in medical practices including elective primary hip and knee arthroplasty. The aim of the study was to examine regional variations in elective total hip and knee arthroplasties over time, and the proportions of these variations which can be explained by individual level or area-level differences in need.

methodsWe obtained secondary data from the Care Register for Health Care to study elective primary hip and knee arthroplasties in total Finnish population aged 25 + years between 2010 and 2017. Two-level Poisson regression models - individuals and hospital regions - were used to study regional differences in the incidence of elective hip and knee arthroplasties in two time periods: 2010 - 2013 and 2014 - 2017. The impact of several individual level explanatory factors (age, socioeconomic position, comorbidities) and area-level factors (need and supply of operations) was measured with the proportional change in variance. Predictions of incidence were measured with incidence rate ratios. The relative differences in risk of the procedures in regions were described with median rate ratios.

resultsWe found small and over time relatively stable regional variation in hip arthroplasties in Finland, while the variation was larger in knee arthroplasties and decreased during the study period. In 2010 - 2013 individual socioeconomic variables explained 10% of variation in hip and 4% in knee arthroplasties, an effect that did not emerge in 2014 - 2017. The area-level musculoskeletal disorder index reflecting the need for care explained a further 44% of the variation in hip arthroplasties in 2010 - 2013, but only 5% in 2014 - 2017 and respectively 22% and 25% in knee arthroplasties. However, our final models explained the regional differences only partially.

conclusionsOur results suggest that eligibility criteria in total hip and knee arthroplasty are increasingly consistent between Finnish hospital districts. Factors related to individual level and regional level need both had an important role in explaining regional variations. Further study is needed on the effect of health policy on equity in access to care in these operations.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCohort StudiesElective Surgical ProceduresFinlandHumansEquity in health careHealth services researchJoint arthroplastyMedical practice variationRegister-based study

Identifiers

PMID35810302
PMCPMC9270793
OpenAlexW4284988072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.